Capitol Alert Insider Edition

Insider Access - Exclusive content for the Insider Edition iPad and iPhone apps

Note: Capitol Alert Insider Edition stories are for the exlusive use of subscribers of the service. You can subscribe with your iPhone or iPad in the App Store.
July 23, 2013
Editorial: Don't link CHP salaries to pay of big city cops

RPCHPHATS.JPG

(July 23 -- By the Editorial Board)

News that Gov. Jerry Brown approved a 5.9 percent pay raise for 6,100 California Highway Patrol officers generated consternation, understandably so. Brown had pledged to hold the line on public employees' pay when voters approved a $6 billion tax hike in November.

The $44.4 million cost of the package in the current fiscal year is a fraction of the $6 billion generated by the new taxes. But the CHP agreement appears to run counter to Brown's pledge.

Unfortunately, the governor had little choice. A deal struck by former Gov. Gray Davis with the California Association of Highway Patrol Officers in 2001 requires that CHP officers receive the average of what five of the highest-paid police agencies in the state pay their officers.

Under that irresponsible agreement, when officials in those jurisdictions decide to give away the store at the bargaining table, California is obligated to do the same for CHP officers.

Ideally, pay rates and benefits should be based on the cost of recruiting and retaining good workers. Surveys should serve as guides, and an indication of what the market for good workers is. But no jurisdiction should base pay rates solely on decisions made by other jurisdictions.

Negotiators for one agency can't know what the resources are for another entity. If a city or county doesn't have the money, it shouldn't matter what another jurisdiction pays. In too many cases, surveys lead to the pay equivalent of arms races. Unable to pay inflated rates they promise, cities end up laying off workers. In the worst case, they seek bankruptcy protection, as happened in Stockton.

There is little reason why pay of CHP officers should be based on what police officers earn in Los Angeles, San Diego, Oakland or San Francisco, or in the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. They all risk their lives when they go to work. But working as a cop in California's big cities is different than patrolling the freeways.

Highway Patrol officers sacrificed during the budget crisis, receiving no raises in 2011 or 2012, and meager increases in 2009 and 2010. For that, they should be commended. However, they are paid well.

In 2012, Highway Patrol officers' average regular pay was $86,837, and 4,707 officers earned more than $100,000 with overtime and other pay, as The Bee's Amy Gebert reported earlier this month.

Highway Patrol officers are highly valued state workers. They should be paid well when they're on the job and receive good pensions when they retire. However, their pay should not be tied to police and sheriff's deputies in California's urban cores.

California officials should not be bound by what decisions made by local politicians, any more than mayors and city councils should be bound by the bargaining decisions made in Sacramento.

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.



FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

November 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30