Capitol Alert Insider Edition

Insider Access - Exclusive content for the Insider Edition iPad and iPhone apps

Note: Capitol Alert Insider Edition stories are for the exlusive use of subscribers of the service. You can subscribe with your iPhone or iPad in the App Store.
September 26, 2013
Another View: Bill wouldn't prevent courts from contracting out

20130311_HA_LEGISLATORS866.JPG

(Sept. 26 -- By Bob Wieckowski, Special to The Bee)

When it comes to accountability of public dollars, our judicial system should stand out as a model of integrity. Instead, The Sacramento Bee's misguided editorial, "Veto bill, let courts contract out in dire times" (Sept. 24), told readers that court bureaucrats should maintain special license to operate outside common-sense laws that protect the public and protect access to our courts.

As the author of Assembly Bill 566, I must set the record straight after The Bee's mistaken assertions on this important legislation. AB 566 does not prevent contracting out, privatization of court services or technological advances. Instead, it establishes very reasonable standards that other branches of government already must follow to ensure that when for-profit companies are hired with our tax dollars, decisions are made with cost, quality and public interest in mind, rather than cronyism.

Nowhere are such standards more important than in our trial courts, the heart of our justice system. Medical records, the identities of crime victims including children, names and addresses of witnesses and jurors in organized crime and gang trials, and DNA information are among the highly sensitive information in court records. All pivotal in the outcome of court cases, this critical information is also ripe for abuse should it fall into the wrong hands.

For these reasons, court reporters and others who hold information critical to the judicial process are sworn officers of the court, held to strict privacy standards under threat of contempt. The sensitivity of trial court proceedings was previously protected when county requirements and protections applied to the trial courts. However, when trial court funding was transferred from county to state control in 1997, these important protections were lost.

AB 566 simply returns basic safeguards to our local courts. It focuses on protecting the public's privacy, the integrity of the courts and taxpayer dollars, not on preventing privatization.

Without question, courts and the public who count on them have suffered as a result of deep budget cuts - all the more reason to ensure court spending is transparent and accountable.

As a prime example, if the same standards that AB 566 applies to local courts had been in place for the statewide judicial branch, they could have prevented a costly court computer boondoggle condemned by The Bee and eventually shelved after racking up a half-billion-dollar bill for taxpayers.

For the sake of justice and accountability for tax dollars, Gov. Jerry Brown should sign AB 566.

Assemblyman Bob Wieckowski, D-Fremont, chairs the Assembly Judiciary Committee.

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.



FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

November 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30