Capitol Alert

The latest on California politics and government

Assembly Republicans have taken a stand against the Democratic budget package by threatening to block one of the few bills that require two-thirds support, a proposal that would allow state fiscal leaders to delay payments to schools and local governments to help ensure California has enough cash to pay its priority bills.

Assembly Bill X8 5 is one of the more crucial bills in the Democratic budget package, considering that it is designed to shore up California's cash flow in the coming weeks. The legislative delay also forced Treasurer Bill Lockyer to postpone a $2 billion infrastructure bond sale that he had planned for next week.

The bill passed the Senate on a bipartisan 37-2 vote Monday. But Assembly Republicans did not approve the measure and demanded a budget committee hearing before considering it on the floor.

Assemblyman Jim Nielsen, R-Gerber, said at the close of the Assembly Budget Committee's hearing Wednesday that Republicans may withhold their floor votes on ABX8 5 unless Democrats negotiate with Republicans to pass "some real cuts." Nielsen and three other Republicans on the committee ultimately voted to move the bill to the Assembly floor, but with the proviso that the GOP caucus wants further negotiations.

"I do not believe it prudent for us to just move some of these solutions along without cuts concomitant," Nielsen said, adding later, "I'm being predictive of floor action. I'm not saying that there are going to be any floor votes for two-thirds things unless we get some cuts, simply put."

Assemblyman Wesley Chesbro, D-Arcata, responded, "I'd just like to express, Madame Chair, some frustration with our friends from the other party who say they want more cuts. And we put up our votes for cuts from things we care very deeply about, and they're (not voting for them)."

Nielsen later said he could not guarantee that the caucus would block the cash deferral bill without further cuts. But he said Republicans wanted the chance to negotiate both immediate reductions and cuts in the next fiscal year. Assembly Democrats passed about $2.3 billion in solutions on Monday, but no major reductions in education or health and human services that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger wanted.

"A good place to start would be the governor's list of cuts," Nielsen said. He offered no more specifics on cuts, saying he didn't want to "negotiate the budget in the newspaper."

Shannon Murphy, spokeswoman for Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, D-Los Angeles, said Republicans were shifting their demands.

"On Monday they said they wanted a hearing, and made no mention of leveraging additional cuts," Murphy said in an e-mail. "Today we gave them their hearing, and now they have moved the ball and want to leverage cuts. We are now past the 45-day period for the Special Session and the Republicans have never put forth a single idea or plan. They simply want to leverage their votes on one bill for unrelated issues."

ABX8 5 would give authority to the treasurer, controller and Department of Finance to delay payments to schools and local governments as needed over the next 16 months. Fiscal leaders already have said they need to delay payments to higher education, trial courts and the State Teachers' Retirement System in March and April to ensure California has enough cash to pay its bills in early April.

Various education advocates, particularly those from community colleges, testified Wednesday that the payment delays could hurt schools' abilities to meet their own financial obligations. Democratic legislators said they would try to address those concerns with subsequent legislation.

California is running a $6.6 billion deficit in 2009-10, contributing to the cash flow problem. But the state also has annual cash timing issues because it receives the bulk of its tax revenues in mid-April when Californians file their 2009 income taxes. After mid-April, the state will have enough cash to pay its bills until mid-summer.

Lockyer said Wednesday that he needs ABX8 5 to pass before he is willing to sell another round of infrastructure bonds. He canceled a $2 billion sale scheduled for next week and another $2 billion sale later in March. That would allow new construction projects to begin and create more jobs.

"For every billion dollars in bond spending that goes out the door, it creates about 16,000 good, middle-class, largely blue-collar construction trade type of work," Lockyer said.

The postponement of the bond sale does not yet threaten to slow or stop current construction projects, which have enough money to continue until mid-summer. But it makes it more difficult for the state to begin new projects this spring.

After the hearing, Nielsen questioned the consequences of not passing AB X8 5.

"Let's just say the consequences are arguable," Nielsen said. "I think there are arguments that indicate we are not on the precipice at this point."

The Assembly is scheduled to hold floor session today at 9:30 a.m.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

More Capitol Alert

Capitol Alert on Twitter

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Popular Categories

Categories


April 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Monthly Archives