Capitol Alert

The latest on California politics and government

UPDATED at 3:00 p.m. to add information about auditor's analysis of data.

The 620 remaining applicants for seats on the state's new redistricting commission are mostly affluent white male Democrats, according to a new statistical study by one of those on the list.

Vladimir Kogan, a refugee from the Soviet Union who later became a journalist and political science scholar, reviewed the on-line profiles of all 620 to create his demographic and political profile. He is a researcher on governance issues for the Lane Center for the American West at Stanford University and a doctoral candidate at the University of California, San Diego.

Kogan found that 67.6 percent of those on the list are non-Latino whites -- roughly comparable to the proportion of the electorate that's white but more than 25 percentage points higher than the white non-Latino proportion of the overall population.

His analysis also determined that 53.3 percent are Democrats -- about nine percentage points higher than Democratic voter registration statewide -- and just 28.9 percent are Republicans, about two points below GOP registration.

Kogan determined that 63.2 percent of the remaining applicants are male, even though the electorate is divided almost evenly by gender, and that over 75 percent have incomes of $75,000 a year or higher.

The state auditor's office received 4,547 complete applications for the redistricting commission, created when voters passed Proposition 11 in 2008. The commission will draw new legislative and Board of Equalization districts based on the 2010 census numbers that will be released next April.

Later this year, the selection panel will narrow the 620 remaining applicants on the list to 60 -- 20 Democrats, 20 Republicans and 20 independents or minor party registrants -- before turning those names over to the Legislature.

Legislative leaders can strike up to 24 of those names. The names of those left will go back to the auditor's office to be narrowed again by a random drawing to eight members, who will choose the remaining six members of the 14-person commission from other applicants still in the pool.

That complex selection process, however, could be altered by measures on the November ballot. One, which has already qualified, would extend the commission's authority to congressional districts. Another, still pending signature verification, would abolish the commission altogether and return redistricting to the Legislature.

Detailed data on the 620 remaining on the list - the basis for Kogan's research - can be found here.

Kogan, by the way, is a white male independent who lists his income as under $35,000 a year - not surprising given that he's a graduate student.

UPDATE: The state auditor's office has posted its own analysis of the current pool of redistricting commission applicants with very slightly different data than Kogan generated but the same overall thrust. It can be found here.

Worth noting: Because the current pool of Democrats is larger than those for Republicans and independents, the remaining Democrats have a smaller chance of making the cut for the next pool of 60.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


More Capitol Alert

Capitol Alert on Twitter

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Popular Categories

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

Categories


October 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Monthly Archives