Capitol Alert

The latest on California politics and government

Updated at 12:35 p.m. to include list of cuts and Analyst's Office comment.

If lawmakers pursue a cuts-only budget to solve the state's $26.6 billion deficit, they could eliminate class-size reduction, require that kindergarten students be 5 years old at enrollment and hike university tuition by another 7 to 10 percent, according to a new review by the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office.

There's also a stark option for state workers: reduce pay by an additional 9.24 percent (equal to two furlough days) and reduce state contributions to employee health care by 30 percent.

The Feb. 10 letter responds to Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, who asked the Analyst's Office what the Legislature could do if voters or lawmakers reject tax revenues proposed by Gov. Jerry Brown. The LAO offered $13.5 billion in alternatives, presuming under Leno's request that the ballot taxes would not succeed and other revenue ideas like eliminating enterprise zones would fail.

Democrats were at odds as to whether to release the list, let alone pursue a vote on items suggested by the Legislative Analyst. Brown purposely chose not to outline an alternative budget should his five-year extension of tax hikes fail to make the ballot or be rejected by voters.

But Leno and Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, said voters need to know what is at stake. Leno's office provided the letter Monday.

As was expected, the alternatives are grim - $4.5 billion less for K-12 schools than Brown proposed, as well as a $1.7 billion reduction to universities and community colleges. The Analyst's Office also laid out $2.6 billion in cuts to corrections and courts, $1.2 billion in health and social services reductions, $1.8 billion in cuts to "general" state and local government operations and $1.7 billion in cuts to transportation and resources.

Jason Sisney, LAO director of state finance, emphasized that his office was not necessarily recommending the cuts, but offering options that responded to a hypothetical suggested by Leno.

"We tried to score savings we thought were realistic under the law," Sisney said. "We attempted to identify as many options that would avoid touching core programs as much as possible."

Here's a sampling of what the Analyst's Office proposed as alternatives to higher tax extensions proposed by Brown (savings in parentheses):

K-12 Schools
-- Eliminate K-3 class size reduction ($1.275 billion)
-- Require that kindergarteners be 5 years old at enrollment in 2011-12 ($700 million)

Community Colleges
-- Impose a 90-unit cap on each student's taxpayer-subsidized credits ($250 million)
-- Increase community college fees from $26/unit to $66/unit ($170 million)
-- Eliminate state subsidy for intercollegiate athletics ($55 million)

Universities
-- Increase tuition another 7 percent for UC and 10 percent for CSU ($270 million)
-- Reduce CSU enrollment by 5 percent ($124 million)
-- Reduce personnel costs by 10 percent at UC and 5 percent at CSU ($408 million)

Health and Social Services
-- Reduce state-paid IHSS provider salary to minimum wage ($300 million)
-- Eliminate food and cash aid for noncitizens whom courts have determined can receive benefits ($190 million)
-- Stricter income eligibility for welfare-to-work recipients ($180 million)

Criminal Justice and Judiciary
-- Require second and third "strikes" to be serious or violent in "Three Strikes" sentencing ($50 million)
-- Eliminate funding for public safety grant programs ($506 million)
-- Automated speed enforcement cameras ($150 million)
-- Two furloughs a month for court employees ($130 million)

General Government
-- Reduce state employee pay an additional 9.24 percent, equal to two furlough days ($700 million)
-- Reduce state contribution to employee health care by 30 percent ($330 million)
-- End state general fund support for Small Business Loan Guarantee Program ($24 million)
-- Eliminate Department of Fair Employment and Housing and state commission ($17.2 million)

Transportation
-- Enact another accounting swap that eliminates sales tax on diesel and increases weight fees, reducing funds for local transit and intercity rail ($400 million)

Resources and Environmental Protection
-- Allow oil drilling at Tranquillon Ridge ($100 million)
-- Reduce wildland firefighting costs by imposing a new fee on residential property owners in areas protected by the state, clarifying that the state is not fiscally responsible for loss of life and property and shrinking territory for which state is responsible ($300 million)

Click here to read the entire letter.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

More Capitol Alert

Capitol Alert on Twitter

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Popular Categories

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives


Latest California Clips