Capitol Alert

The latest on California politics and government

RB Point Cabrillo Light Station.JPGDemocratic state Sens. Joe Simitian and Noreen Evans today rolled out a proposal aimed at keeping the gates open at more than 50 California state parks set to close this summer.

The proposal, which will be heard by a Senate budget subcommittee Wednesday afternoon, includes shifting as much as $40 million from existing state accounts for road maintenance, septic system repairs and trails and off-highway vehicle funds to cover parks' costs. That money would be used for purposes consistent with the original intent of those funds, Evans and Simitian said.

Other recommendations include facilitating operating agreements with nonprofits, improving entry fee collection efforts and exploring other funding sources, such as license plates and concessions agreements. Some parks would still likely have to close, but supporters said they hoped those would be able to reopen in the future thanks to the plan.

State parks officials announced last year that 70 of the state's more than 270 parks would be targeted for closure due to budget cuts. The closures are projected to save about $22 million. The parks department has been able to form partnerships with nonprofits and local governments to keep 16 of those parks open. Richard Stapler, spokesman for Natural Resources Secretary John Laird, said officials are involved in substantive talks involving about a dozen additional parks.

Evans, whose Northern California district includes 20 parks on the original closure list, billed the proposals as alternatives to a move that she said would "devastate" local economic development, the state's natural resources and public enjoyment of parks.

"The state has never closed a state park. Not even in the Great Depression," the Santa Rosa Democrat said. "We have handled this challenge before in a way that was positive for the state parks."

Simitian called closing the parks is "fundamentally ill-conceived," especially given potential costs involved in shutting the properties down.

"Frankly the cost of one lawsuit from someone who has a horrible accident in a state park that was untended, the cost of fire suppression if there's no one on the scene could outstrip the savings pretty quickly," the Palo Alto Democrat said.

Department of Finance spokesman H.D. Palmer said while finance officials were briefed on the proposal yesterday, there are "a lot of specifics that we need to look at before we can give a more definitive response" about its viability. He said any changes to the Brown administration's current proposals on parks funding will be reflected in the governor's revised budget plan, which is expected to be released Monday.

One hundred state parks were saved from the chopping block in 2009, when then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger backed away from an earlier order to shut them down and directed officials to instead implement seasonal closures and cut back on maintenance and equipment costs. Other efforts to raise money for the parks, such as a 2010 ballot measure that would have increased the vehicle registration fee, have failed in recent years.

Simitian -- who chairs the Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Resources, Environmental Protection, Energy and Transportation -- said he is "cautiously optimistic" about the fate of the proposal.

"This is God's gift to California,' Simitian said of the state parks. "We're talking about putting up a 'do not enter' sign. I think people find that incomprehensible."

RELATED POSTS:
California officials announce closure of 70 state parks
See California state parks closure list

Editor's note: This post was updated at 3:15 p.m. with comments from H.D. Palmer.

PHOTO CREDIT: Guests walk from the inn to the lighthouse at the Point Cabrillo Light Station, a California state park in Mendocino County. Randall Benton / Sacramento Bee file, 2008.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

More Capitol Alert

Capitol Alert on Twitter

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Popular Categories

Categories


June 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Monthly Archives


Latest California Clips