The draft trailer bill language, which education lobbyists distributed Wednesday, would limit districts' fund balances in most cases to two or three times the minimum required, a potential victory for public employee unions resistant to tying money up in reserves.
In a letter to Brown administration officials and lawmakers Wednesday, the Education Management Group, which represents school boards, administrators and superintendents, said the bill language is "fiscally irresponsible" and inconsistent with principles of local control.
"For most of the last two decades, California has focused on preventing school district bankruptcies by enacting laws that require multiyear projections, enforcement of strict fiscal standards by county offices of education, early intervention, and even the authority to override the spending decisions of local governing boards," the letter said. "It is therefore ironic that, at the very time an initiative has been placed on the statewide ballot to strengthen the state's rainy day fund, that the Legislature and Governor would consider statutory changes that eviscerate provisions at the local school district level that are based on the same premise of fiscal prudence and responsibility."
The Education Management Group also objected to the last-minute insertion of the language in a months-long budget process.
"People's jaws are still agape," said Bob Blattner, an education lobbyist. "At the very last second, it's such a significant policy issue to drop."
The trailer bill language comes as lawmakers and Gov. Jerry Brown move closer to a deal in this year's budget negotiations, with the Legislature expected to vote Sunday on the main budget bill. Brown and lawmakers last month agreed to a major component of the spending plan, a rainy-day fund measure that, if approved by voters, would increase statewide reserves.
Public employee unions had objected to a rainy day fund measure previously scheduled for the ballot. Kevin Gordon, a longtime education lobbyist, said he suspects "some linkage here to the rainy day fund and the fact that the California Teachers Association didn't object" to the new rainy day fund measure. Jeff Vaca, one of the Education Management Group letter's authors and deputy executive director for governmental relations at the California Association of School Business Officials, said the bill language is "probably as much political as it is policy."
The Brown administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
Mike Myslinski, a spokesman for CTA, said he was unaware of any link between the rainy day fund measure and the trailer bill, but he said his organization supports the trailer bill language.
"This is all about understanding that school districts really must spend the taxpayers' dollars that they receive in the classroom," he said.
Fred Glass, of the California Federation of Teachers, said the organization is supportive of limiting reserves, too.
While a prudent reserve account is responsible, Glass said, "there are some districts that have 15, 20, 25 percent ending balances."
He said that "may translate into fiscal security for administrators, but it means limiting programs for students."
Editor's note: This post was updated at 3:28 p.m. to include Myslinski's remarks
PHOTO: Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, left, Gov. Jerry Brown, center, and Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez, right, celebrate a budget deal with a formal announcement at the Capitol on Tuesday, June 11, 2013. The Sacramento Bee/Randy Pench