City Beat

News, insight and discussion on Sacramento and its neighborhoods

February 29, 2012
Sacramento will contribute $255 million to new arena

By Tony Bizjak, Ryan Lillis and Dale Kasler
tbizjak@sacbee.com

Sacramento city officials will release details tomorrow of the arena deal reached earlier this week with the Kings, including this notable number: $255,530,000.

That's the amount Mayor Kevin Johnson and his negotiators agreed the city officially will contribute to building an arena in the downtown railyard by 2015.

The official price tag of the arena was also bumped up from $387 million to $391 million.

The figures are contained in a 15-20 page "term sheet" agreed to Monday during negotiations between the city, the Sacramento Kings, the NBA and several private companies. The Bee received a City Hall briefing today on some of the deal points. Key elements:

- The Kings will sign a lease obligating the team and any potential future owners to remain in Sacramento for 30 years.

- The city will allow the Kings to refinance their existing $67 million city loan.

- A five percent surcharge will be applied on all tickets sold at the arena, for sports and non-sports events. That money will go to the city.

- The city receives a percentage of net profits earned by the arena operator.

- The anticipated prep and construction cost estimate for the arena has nudged up from a previous $387 million to $391 million.

-Another $3 million of the $391 million is slated to come from a public campaign, led by the mayor and Councilman Steve Cohn, where residents can purchase engraved bricks and plaques to be included at the facility site.

A mayoral spokesman said officials believe the city may be able to come up with its entire $255 million share through creative financing involving downtown garages - possibly by leasing the garages to a private operator or by creating a financing authority to borrow against expected future parking revenues. Parking revenues will increase over time, officials said, as downtown grows, as well as when the arena is built and more people park at nights and weekends.

The city also expects to sell 100 acres it owns next to the current Power Balance Pavilion in North Natomas and possibly several smaller lots in downtown to contribute to the city share.

That $255 million number means the city, as arena owner, will pay 65 percent of the arena cost.

The Sacramento Kings, as major tenant, have agreed to kick in $73.25 million, a 19 percent share. Some of that money is expected to come from sale of the Power Balance Pavilion site. Kings owners say they also have agreed to pay the city an estimated $70 million over a 30-year lease period. Some of it comes by passing through five-percent ticket surcharge revenues. Some will come in the form of taxes the team will pay the city over time.

The deal also allows the team to refinance its existing $67 million loan with the city in 2015 when the Kings would move from Power Balance Pavilion to the downtown arena. The new loan is expected to reduce the Kings' annual payments and spread them over a new 30-year term.

The project's third major partner, Anschutz Entertainment Group, a worldwide operator of sports and music venues, has agreed to put up $58.75 million for the right to operate the arena for 30 years.

The city will receive an upfront share of AEG's profits - $1.5 million out of the first $10 million net profit AEG earns each year, and $1.5 million of the next $5 million AEG earns. The city and AEG will split profits 50-50 for any profits AEG makes beyond $15 million each year.

City officials declined to say which entity, the city or AEG, will be on the hook to pay for any major arena upgrades over the 30-year lifespan of the deal. Those terms, which are to spelled out in an upcoming agreement between the city and AEG, have become major sticking points and financial headaches in other city stadium and arena deals.

The Kings will have a separate deal with AEG on revenue sharing during basketball game days.

The City Council will be asked next Tuesday to vote on that term sheet, and will be updated by city staff on the ongoing process of determining where the city's $255 million contribution comes from.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.



About City Beat

Ryan Lillis has covered the city of Sacramento, its 108 neighborhoods and its politicians since 2008. Prior to that, he covered crime at The Bee. A native of upstate New York, Lillis has a journalism degree from the University of California, Berkeley.

Contact reporter Ryan Lillis at rlillis@sacbee.com

Poll

Does the Kings' poor performance of late impact the arena work?

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Watch Bee news, lifestyle videos | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Ryan Lillis on Twitter

Follow "Ryan_Lillis" on Twitter

October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Sacramento City Resources

City Web Sites

How to contact city officials