Sacto 9-1-1

The court hearing for those accused in the library bribery and overbilling case has ended without major developments. Here's Crystal Carreon's update:

By Crystal Carreon

A married couple and an ex-supervisor at the Sacramento Public Library appeared in court this morning but did not enter pleas on felony charges linked to an alleged billing scam that investigators say inflated work costs, paid for bribes and gouged more than half-a-million dollars from taxpayers.

Superior Court Judge Gary Ransom read charges against James Mayle, 63, his wife, Janie Rankins-Mayle, 59, and former library facilities supervisor Dennis Nilsson, 61, that include bribery and grand theft. Nilsson and Mayle also face additional counts of conflict of interest.

During the brief hearing, all three of the accused remained stoic with their eyes fixed on the judge.

Defense attorneys Daniel Karalash for Nilsson, Richard Dudek for Mayle and Philip McCarthy for Rankins-Mayle agreed to return to court on May 1 for further proceedings.

After the hearing, the Mayles and Nilsson quickly left the courthouse separately and declined to comment. Their lawyers also refused to discuss the case.

The hearing took place just two blocks from the city's central library where audits, in light of the scandal, have raised questions of oversight, checks and balances and bookkeeping at one of the largest branches in the region.

Investigators believe Nilsson abused his role as facilities manager and colluded to steer business -- maintenance, repairs, and other handyman work -- to a firm owned by Rankins-Mayle beginning in 2004 and continuing through part of last year.

Rankins-Mayle, who headed the firm that eventually became known as Hagginwood Services Inc., is the wife of Mayle, who worked for the library at the time as security director. Mayle was also the vice president of his wife's firm.

According to investigators, subcontractors were directed by Nilsson to turn over their bills to Haggingwood instead following earlier practices of filing directly with the library. Hagginwod then allegedly doubled and even tripled those charges and submitted its bills to the library on official company letterhead.

For example, investigators found that one subcontractor charged $3,240 for changing ceiling tiles, but when he submitted those charges to Hagginwood, the firm turned around and billed the library for $10,480.

Library officials began hearing about suspicious billing by Hagginwood as early as 2005 -- and an employee had even pointed out to Nilsson the Mayles' ties to the company. Nevertheless, Hagginwood was awarded a contract a year later to oversee and manage maintenance work at the library, documents show.

Hagginwood, as it was later discovered, did not have a state license to do contractor's work.

It is estimated that the firm billed the library more than $1.3 million for its work. Investigators have estimated at least $650,000 of that was questionable, according to a report commissioned by the library.

When later questioned about the numbers, Rankins-Mayle said in a recently released affidavit that she was not given any direction on how to bill the library and that her only direction came from Nilsson.

Nilsson approved all invoices from Hagginwood over the years. Prosecutors allege he was also paid more than $90,000 in bribes from the Mayles.

All three were arrested last week in connection with the alleged scheme. They each remain free on $45,000 bail.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories