Sacto 9-1-1

ATT250966.jpgAs workers put up temporary fencing around the destroyed Fort Natomas in Jefferson Park Monday afternoon, residents, many of whom helped built the popular playground in 1991-- then again in 2006 -- gathered.

Their collective mood ranged from disbelief to anger, from helplessness to determination to rebuild the landmark South Natomas structure. The decorative tile wall -- erected in 1991-- adorns the front of the playground. It features names of parents and their children, many of whom are now 17 and older and helped rebuild the playground in November 2006 ago after it was destroyed by the first fire that June. They visited the charred site today, as did many smaller children who were denied a place to play.

In a comment to Bill Lindelof's story about the early Monday fire, reader bxluddite wrote, "Like my daughter said over and over, when we stopped by today, 'The park is sad.'

City Councilman Ray Tretheway was also shaken by the early morning fire. "I can't believe they've taken the playground again ... It's the best playground in the city," he told many residents.

Many school and community playgrounds have been targeted recently. Here's a Bee story about two fires set May 10, one at John Bidwell Elementary School in the Meadowview area and another at Hazel Strauch Elementary School, also in the South Natomas area. Fort Natomas is next to Jefferson Elementary School.

A meeting is planned at 6:30 p.m. Thursday to discuss what the community will do next.

Mayor Heather Fargo and Tretheway have offered a $5,000 reward for the arrest and conviction of the people responsible for destroying the playground, the Sacramento Fire Department announced this afternoon.

Anyone with information about the playground fire is asked to call the Sacramento Fire Department's arson tip line at (916) 808-8732.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories