Sacto 9-1-1

From Chelsea Phua;

Aaron Swickard, 43, was well spoken, impeccably dressed and exuded success, according to a woman prosecutors say was swindled by him.

"He has a beautiful house, a beautiful car, he's a lawyer," said Kathleen Farrar, 65, who spent more than 30 years teaching in the Antioch School District before retiring.

Last month, Swickard pleaded no contest in Sacramento Superior Court to felony counts of grand theft by embezzlement and fraud, according to authorities. The former Sacramento attorney also pleaded no contest to state income tax evasion.

He is scheduled for sentencing May 18 and faces a maximum of 5 years and 8 months in prison.

Prosecutors said Swickard stole more than $850,000 from Farrar and another client. He also failed to report more than $200,000 in income earned in 2005 and 2006, and owes the state $75,000 in unpaid taxes, according to California Franchise Tax Board officials.

Farrar said she met Swickard in 2006 when she was planning an addition to her home on Bentley Street in Concord. A friend recommended contractor Alifeleti Vaituulala, who ran the business with Swickard.

Swickard told Farrar he was an attorney who had "special skill, knowledge and expertise in real estate transactions and construction projects," according to court documents.

Farrar said she interviewed six companies, and chose Swickard's.

"When they came into my home, it was like good friends," Farrar said. "All the time we laughed and joked when we were looking over the plans."

Swickard took her to look for appliances and remodeling materials and helped her pick out a mantel, she said.

She said she signed a contract for an $80,000 construction project, and wrote Swickard a check for that amount that he said he planned to put in an escrow account.

The company completed only one day of actual work, prosecutors said.

In the meantime, Swickard persuaded Farrar to join him and Vaituulala in buying and selling real estate, and to use a rental property that she owned free of debt to secure loans for their investments, she said.

In July 2006, Farrar signed documents allowing Swickard to take out a $430,000 loan secured by her rental property. He used the money to buy property in Sacramento and transferred it to a company created for his and Vaituulala's benefit, prosecutors said.

Farrar eventually filed a civil lawsuit and won a judgment against Swickard for $736,000 to cover losses associated with the never-completed construction project and investment loans. She said she has yet to receive that money. And instead of one mortgage, she now has two.

On a fixed income, Farrar said she fears she may lose both her home and the rental property to foreclosure.

Court records indicate Swickard earlier served time behind bars. He was convicted of bank robbery in Utah in 1983 when he was 18. He served four months and was given 4 years probation. In 1986, the California Highway Patrol arrested him for driving under the influence at speeds of 100 mph.

In 1991, he disclosed his criminal history when applying to the Lorenzo Patino School of Law. He graduated the program and in December 2000 was admitted to the California State Bar. He resigned from the bar last spring.

Court documents outline another case against him involving client Terry McSweeney. Documents say Swickard persuaded McSweeney to invest in a business venture in 2004. McSweeney never received any shares, returns or dividends, prosecutors said.

McSweeney later sued Swickard and won a civil judgment of $577,000.

For Farrar, the losses go beyond the economic.

"Once I found out I was in trouble, all I did was cry," she said.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories