Sacto 9-1-1

From Sam Stanton:

The parents of the young couple found shot to death on a Sonoma County beach five years ago are anxiously awaiting word on whether a man killed by New Mexico authorities last week was responsible for the slaying of their children.

"We're always hopeful, every time something like this comes up we're hopeful," said Robert Allen, whose 26-year-old son, Jason, was killed on a Jenner beach in August 2004 along with his 22-year-old fiancee, Lindsay Cutshall. "But we don't want to get our hopes up too high because it sounds like a real long shot to us."

The young couple were found shot to death in their sleeping bag Aug. 18, 2004, while they were camped out near the mouth of the Russian River. They had been working as guides at a Christian adventure camp near Coloma at the time, and Sonoma County sheriff's detectives have doggedly worked the case since, collecting DNA samples, offering rewards and pursuing hundreds of leads.

Since almost the beginning of the case, they have been looking to question Joseph Henry Burgess, a 62-year-old man who had been living in the wild in New Mexico for the last 10 years.

Burgess was killed in a shootout last Thursday after he killed a sheriff's deputy there who had been staking out a cabin Burgess was suspected of breaking into. Family members of the slain couple say they are waiting to see if Sonoma County authorities can find any evidence that ties Burgess to the 2004 killings.

He had been wanted for years in the 1972 slaying of two campers on a beach in Vancouver Island, British Columbia, and the similarities between the two cases -- both couples were unmarried, devout Christians sleeping on a beach and all of them were shot in the head in their sleeping bags -- had intrigued investigators.

Authorities say there were indications that Burgess may have had strong religious beliefs that couples should not sleep together before they married. However, little was known about Burgess and any ties that might place him in Northern California at the time of the Jenner slayings.

"We don't have a lot on him," Sonoma County sheriff's Capt. Matt McCaffrey said today. "It seems pretty obvious this guy was living off the grid. The reason they had this place staked out was he was living and having shelter in an isolated area. That tells me this guy had some determination and wherewithal to stay isolated and off the grid. He obviously didn't have credit cards and cell phones or utility bills that would help us track him down."

McCaffrey said investigators believe Burgess had relatives living in Northern California and they were seeking to locate and question them about whether he had been in the area at the time of the 2004 slayings.

Sonoma sheriff's officials are planning to travel to New Mexico in search of any evidence that would tie Burgess to the Jenner killings.

Meanwhile, the parents of the slain couple are fielding calls from reporters and waiting to see if they can finally know who killed their children.

"We'd like to know one way or another," the Rev. Chris Cutshall, Lindsay's father, said in a phone interview from his Bible church in Fresno, Ohio. "Our faith has always been in the Lord, so we're just really settled in, but of course we would like to know. And if it's not him, we'd like to find out who it is and allow justice to come to that person."

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories