Sacto 9-1-1

Bee Staff

The UC Davis program in forensic science has been awarded three grants - including one to develop a bullet-matching database - totaling more than $2.2 million by the U.S. Department of Justice.

The grants: $1.4 million over three years to develop a bullet-matching database; $700,000 over two years for studying the impressions left on cartridge cases by firearms; and $150,000 over two years to establish whether torn pieces of duct-tape can be reliably matched, according to a UCD news release.

The broad aim of all three grants is to develop methods to associate probabilities with forensic evidence, said David Howitt, professor of chemical engineering and materials science at UC Davis. He is co-principal investigator on the two firearms-related grants with staff researcher Karen Cebra and Fred Tulleners, director of the campus's graduate program in forensic science, the release states.

"Based on the extent of similarities, is the likelihood of a match one in a hundred, one in a thousand, one in a million?" Howitt said.

In a report published earlier this year, the National Academies of Science called for more research to establish the scientific basis of forensic methods and develop ways to measure the uncertainty in forensic conclusions, the release states.

The UC Davis program aims to meet that need, Tulleners said.

In the largest grant, the researchers will develop a database of 10,000 bullets from Northern California crime labs, the release states. They will use a technique called confocal microscopy to study the surface features of bullets, and identify key characteristics that can be used to compare bullets in a statistically accurate way, the release states.

Comparing photographs of bullets can be misleading because of differences in how the pictures are taken, Howitt said. And digital images contain so much data that the files become very large, requiring more powerful computers and causing statistical problems, the release states.

Instead, the UC Davis team plans to identify key elements that describe a bullet and that can then be entered in a database and compared with the "signature" of another bullet, the release states.

"It's much easier to make comparisons if you know what you're looking for," Howitt said.

The $700,000 grant will look at the impressions left on cartridge cases by the breech face of a gun, the release states. Although guns are mass-produced items, Tulleners said that differences in the finishing process mean that they expect to find variations in the marks left by breech faces of different guns, even when the same parts were manufactured consecutively under the same controlled conditions.

In the third grant, Tulleners and Jerome Braun, senior statistician in the Department of Statistics, will look at whether torn pieces of duct tape can be matched reliably, the release states.

Duct tape is often used to bind kidnap or murder victims, and remnants of tape can be recovered from crime scenes. At present, duct tape comparison is purely subjective, the release states.

"We want to provide some statistics that prove a duct tape tear is unique," Tulleners said.

The graduate program in forensic science offers a research-oriented Master of Science degree taught by an interdisciplinary group of UC Davis faculty and outside experts, the release states.

The program provides a thorough training in the latest scientific techniques and forensic methods, equipping graduates to work in forensic science laboratories. It is the only graduate degree program of its kind in the state and currently has an enrollment of about 85 students, the release states.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories