Sacto 9-1-1

By Andy Furillo
afurillo@sacbee.com

The prosecutor suggested today that Joseph Skates lost his temper when 3-year-old Manuel "Manny" Maciel had a potty training accident and that's why the man hit, kicked or slammed the boy so hard that he killed him.

In closing arguments in Skates' second-degree murder, trial, the defendant's lawyer countered that his client didn't do anything to hurt the boy, whom he considered his own, and that the district attorney was speculating about what happened inside a North Natomas apartment the day Manny was fatally injured on Nov. 7, 2008. Manny was taken to UC Davis Medical Center where he died two days later.

Arguments were scheduled to continue this afternoon before Sacramento Superior Court Judge Timothy M. Frawley sends the jury away to deliberate.

Deputy District Attorney Dawn Bladet told jurors that a coroner's autopsy determined that Manny died of blunt-force injuries to the head and that his internal organs were "crushed" against his spine from an additional abdominal injury he suffered.

Bladet said it took "an adult man, using his hands, fist, and foot, who is frustrated, angry, and out of control" to "create that force." There was another adult male in the house at the time the boy is believed to have been injured, but Bladet said that Skates, testifying in his own defense last week, said that the other man was asleep.

Holding up the blue one-piece pajamas Manny wore the day he was hurt, Bladet said that the clothing was soaked in urine when authorities found it in a bedroom in the Zurlo Way apartment where the defendant was staying with his girlfriend and her three sons.

The prosecutor said that potty-training accidents are "the kind of thing that make people lose it."

Bladet also hammered on the 30 minutes it took for the 25-year-old defendant to call anybody from the time he discovered that the boy was hurt. Skates never called 911.

In his argument, defense attorney Jesse Ortiz told the jury, "You're being asked to speculate. You're being asked to guess about what might have happened because (prosecutors) say it happened."

Ortiz said that Skates loved Manny and his brothers and that he became attached to them. He showed the jury pictures that Skates and his girlfriend, Rosalie Uribe, took of the three smiling boys in a pumpkin patch less than two weeks before Manny died and another one of the boys dressed in Halloween costumes a week before the death.

"Those were Joseph's boys," Ortiz said. "He got them ready. He got them their costumes."

The defense lawyer said Skates "panicked" after he found the injured Manny on the floor of the apartment and that he "had no idea what to do."

"He wishes he could tell you why he didn't do more, but that's what happened," Ortiz said.

Ortiz has previously suggested that Manny sustained his head injuries by falling off a couch or that they were inflicted by somebody else. He argued today that it was a California Highway Patrol officer in his efforts to administer aid to Manny the morning he was hurt who inflicted the crushing abdominal injuries.

The officer "didn't know what he was doing," Ortiz argued.

Previous coverage:

Failure to call 911 cited at trial in death - Feb. 5, 2010

Mom of slain boy testifies at boyfriend's murder trial - Feb. 2, 2010

Sacramento man goes on trial in death of boy, 3 - Jan. 29, 2010

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories