Sacto 9-1-1

By Denny Walsh and Sam Stanton
dwalsh@sacbee.com

A federal judge this morning postponed deciding whether indicted tomato executive Frederick Scott Salyer can be released on bail, calling the impending decision one of the most difficult he has faced in decades on the federal bench.

"I have been thinking since last night of how to solve this problem, and I have no idea," U.S. District Court Judge Lawrence K. Karlton said as Salyer sat at the defense table in an orange Sacramento County Jail jumpsuit.

Karlton said that if Salyer remains in jail it could take years for the defendant to review the million pages of documents prosecutors have amassed to use against him.

But he also said he has concerns about the risk of the multimillionaire Salyer deciding to flee prosecution rather than face the prospect of spending 20 years in prison.

Prosecutor Sean Flynn argued that Salyer could be moved to a place such as the Nevada County Jail, where a room might be available for him to confer with his attorneys and review evidence.

But Salyer defense attorney Malcolm Segal said he would need a 20-foot-by-40-foot "war" room to store documents, put up wall charts, set up video equipment and view computer hard drives.

He said restrictions at the Sacramento jail make it impossible to mount a defense for the 54-year-old Salyer, who faces seven counts of racketeering, conspiracy, bribery and obstruction of justice.

"I can mount a defense," Segal said. "There's a defense here, and I can mount it, but I can't mount it in jail."

Segal suggested Salyer could be placed under house arrest in his Pebble Beach mansion and guarded at all times, even offering to hire a private security firm for the task, but Karlton finally decided he wanted the opposing sides to file written plans and return to court to resume oral argument about what facilities might be available where Salyer could be detained and still review the evidence against him.

"I find it extraordinarily difficult -- and I've been in this business 33 years on the federal bench -- and I've never had anything like this," Karlton said.

Call The Bee's Denny Walsh, (916) 321-1189.

Previous coverage:

Indicted tomato businessman again seeks release on bail - March 17, 2010

Tomato king sees his empire crumble - March 14, 2010

Key players in the Salyer case - March 14, 2010

Food executive Salyer denied bail in Sacramento federal court - March 4, 2010

SK Foods magnate Salyer hears charges in racketeering case - Feb. 27, 2010

Arrested tomato magnate to appear in Sacramento court - Feb. 26, 2010

SK Foods magnate Salyer indicted on racketeering charges - Feb. 19, 2010

Judge orders SK Foods magnate sent to capital - Feb. 6, 2010

FBI arrests SK Foods owner on fraud charges - Feb. 5, 2010

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories