Sacto 9-1-1

By Denny Walsh and Sam Stanton
dwalsh@sacbee.com

Despite claims that indicted tomato executive Frederick Scott Salyer is wasting away in jail and should be released to prepare a proper defense, a federal judge today again refused to release him without bail backed by a currently encumbered Pebble Reach residence.

A short-tempered U.S. District Judge Lawrence K. Karlton refused to hear new arguments on the matter and set the next hearing for two weeks from now.

Salyer's attorney, Malcolm Segal, told the judge he cannot mount an adequate defense in the complex racketeering, bribery and conspiracy case as long as Salyer jailed, and indicated he would press to go to trial as soon as possible and defend the case "ineffectively," a signal that Segal may be building in an appeal if Salyer is convicted.

Salyer, 54, is in the Sacramento County Jail and has been trying to raise the bail amounts Karlton ordered to ensure he would not flee the country.

He has surrendered his passport and pilot's license, put up $300,000 in cash, offered property owned by friends with $500,000 equity, and has offered to put up the $7 million Pebble Beach home his daughters own.

However, his release was snagged on the fact that Salyer's ex-wife has a legal claim against that property -- called a lis pendens -- and proceedings to lift it are stalled in Superior Court in Monterey.

Segal has claimed that Salyer is suffering medical problems from diabetes that has flared since he was jailed.

"The defendant, a man of modest size, has lost approximately 15-17 pounds in jail in just a couple of months," Segal wrote in court papers, adding that Salyer had to be examined by a doctor because of one episode where his heart rate and blood pressure shot up.

But federal prosecutors say Salyer will flee if released and filed papers reflecting angry telephone conversations Salyer had from the jail that were recorded by authorities.

"The defendant made a number of panicked, despondent calls on a jail telephone that he knew was monitored," the papers said.

In one call to a female friend, Salyer talked of wanting to have his daughter Stephanie convince his ex-wife, Lynne H. Salyer, to lift the lis pendens so he could get out of jail.

"Stephanie has a weapon, she's got that grandkid," Salyer said, according to the transcripts. That is an apparent reference to a grandson born just after his arrest in February.

Later, he called his other daughter, Caroline, and "indicated that he had no reason to live and was 'done,' " the court documents state.

He then told her that Caroline could pressure his ex-wife to help get him released.

"She can go to your mother and say turn over the (expletive) house," he said.

Call The Bee's Denny Walsh, (916) 321-1189.

Previous coverage:

Judge in Sacramento rescinds tomato magnate's bail order - March 31, 2010

Defense says diabetes should get tomato exec out of Sacramento jail - March 25, 2010

Lawyer for tomato exec Salyer cites fraud case's complexity in urging bail - March 19, 2010

Indicted tomato businessman again seeks release on bail - March 17, 2010

Tomato king sees his empire crumble - March 14, 2010

Key players in the Salyer case - March 14, 2010

Food executive Salyer denied bail in Sacramento federal court - March 4, 2010

SK Foods magnate Salyer hears charges in racketeering case - Feb. 27, 2010

Arrested tomato magnate to appear in Sacramento court - Feb. 26, 2010

SK Foods magnate Salyer indicted on racketeering charges - Feb. 19, 2010

Judge orders SK Foods magnate sent to capital - Feb. 6, 2010

FBI arrests SK Foods owner on fraud charges - Feb. 5, 2010

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories