Sacto 9-1-1

By Ed Fletcher
efletcher@sacbee.com

Judge Joseph O'Flaherty took the witness stand this morning as the commission charged with monitoring judges opened its disciplinary hearing into the Placer County Superior Court jurist's actions.

O'Flaherty was admonished by the commission in 2004 for inviting potential jurors who might be racially prejudiced to misrepresent why they couldn't serve.

Formal disciplinary hearings against a judge are rare. It's even rarer that a judge is facing his second disciplinary action. Over the last decade, the State Commission on Judicial Performance has started 34 formal proceeding against California judges.

The hearing today focused on whether O'Flaherty abused his authority in a Dec. 8, 2008 small-claims case.

O'Flaherty ruled in favor of Golden 1 Credit Union in the matter between the bank and car dealer Scott Herold. After the hearing, O'Flaherty issued an informal restraining order against Herold without any due process.

The disciplinary hearing is expected to last at least through Wednesday. The entire process could take several more weeks. The issue is being heard at the Third District Court of Appeal, 621 Capitol Mall.

Tuesday's hearing opened with the three-judge panel that will determine O'Flaherty's punishment viewing the small-claims case.

During the December hearing, O'Flaherty instructed Herold to not use his prepared remarks and often interrupted him.

Herold claimed the bank soured a deal he had with a car buyer. Herold asked the court to find that the bank libeled him and that the buyer breached her contract.

"Why should I believe you over them?" O'Flaherty asks at one point.

"That is not libel in any sense, even in Europe where liable is much broader," the judge said at another point.

On Tuesday, O'Flaherty described the December case as being both "fairly acrimonious" and a "normal small claims case."

After O'Flaherty dismissed the matter and Herold left the courtroom, the judge heard fears that Herold might retaliate against some of the bank's employees.

"He's going to come after us," one of the female bank employees said, according to a record of the hearing. Another female voice talks about being scared.

O'Flaherty then asked the bailiff to bring Herold back into the court and told Herold that he is to have not contact with the employees or that Golden 1 branch for at least 90 days.

Attorney James Murphy, who is representing O'Flaherty, said the judge didn't issue a retraining order, but took the necessary steps to protect court participants.

"They were scared and Judge O'Flaherty had a responsibility to protect the peace," Murphy said. "Judge O'Flaherty did what the thought was right."

O'Flaherty was admonished by the commission in 2004 for inviting potential jurors who might be racially prejudiced to misrepresent why they couldn't serve.

Call The Bee's Ed Fletcher, (916) 321-1269.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories