Sacto 9-1-1

caliguire john march 2010.jpgBy Cathy Locke
clocke@sacbee.com

A Placer County sheriff's deputy admitted today that he violated his probation in March by getting drunk again less than a month after he pleaded guilty to driving under the influence.

A judge, however, decided not to give John Caliguire, left, additional jail time after learning that he had served his original jail sentence and is participating in various rehabilitation programs.

Thomas Leupp, Caliguire's attorney, said his client had served his original 45-day jail sentence, undergone an in-patient rehabilitation program and faithfully attended Alcoholics Anonymous meetings since his rearrest March 24, according to a Placer County District Attorney's Office news release.

Caliguire, 48, a longtime bailiff in the Placer court system, apologized to the judge for not having adhered to conditions of his probation, which includes refraining from alcohol.

Retired visiting Judge Angus Saint-Evens expressed disappointment that Caliguire had violated probation but said he was pleased Caliguire had taken steps in the past three moths to deal with his drinking.

The judge could have sent Caliguire back to jail for another 45-day sentence to fulfill a suspended jail term. Instead, he reimposed the conditions of the three-year probation and added a new requirement that Caliguire attend five Alcoholics Anonymous meetings per week.

Caliguire was arrested for DUI on Nov. 7, 2009, after Rocklin police saw him driving erratically and pulled over his vehicle.

On Feb. 26, he pleaded guilty to misdemeanor DUI and Saint-Evens placed him on probation, ordered him to serve 45 days in jail and suspended an additional 45 days in jail.

But on March 24, Caliguire showed up for his bailiff job intoxicated and was arrested again before bailing out of jail. On May 10, he began serving his original 45-day sentence.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories