Sacto 9-1-1

By Kim Minugh
kminugh@sacbee.com

San Francisco police said that they have received DNA results confirming that man in the Arden Way standoff in Sacramento likely was the suspect in an April homicide in San Francisco.

According to a San Francisco police news release, authorities received confirmation Tuesday that DNA samples taken from the scene of the fatal stabbing of Charles McAleer-Bonilla matched those from Anthony Alvarez, who was fatally shot by the Sacramento County sheriff's SWAT team in June after he had holed up with a 16-month-old hostage for 56 hours. The toddler was unhurt.

The standoff began when Concord police, assisted by the Sheriff's Department, tried to take Alvarez into custody at an Arden Way apartment. At that time, he was a suspect in a series of Bay Area bank robberies and in the attempted murder of a Concord police officer.

He also was a suspect in the San Francisco homicide, authorities said at the time, although DNA tests did not confirm the link until this week.

Despite the DNA results, San Francisco police stated in the news release that detectives will be taking "additional investigative steps" before closing the McAleer-Bonilla homicide case.

Call The Bee's Kim Minugh, (916) 321-1038.

Previous coverage:

Gifts overwhelm family of toddler held in 56-hour standoff - June 26, 2010

Sacramento County sheriff still tallying cost of 3-day standoff - June 17, 2010

Sacramento standoff attracted gawkers - June 17, 2010

Sacramento County sheriff blames standoff on hostage-taker, not S.F. police - June 16, 2010

Timeline of the standoff - June 12, 2010

Standoff ends with suspect dead, child OK - June 12, 2010

Residents return to site of deadly standoff - June 12, 2010

Robbery suspect holds 16-month-old for a second night - June 11, 2010

Armed robbery suspect holds baby hostage in Arden apartment complex - June 10, 2010

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories