Sacto 9-1-1

Chu Vue[1].jpgBy Kim Minugh
kminugh@sacbee.com

Details began to emerge in court today about the reaches to which Chu Vue went in trying to find information about his wife's lover before he allegedly arranged for the man's murder.

He asked a colleague at the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department to run a license plate - which came back to correctional officer Steve Lo - under the ruse that the car had nearly run him down, according to testimony. He searched the man's name in law enforcement databases, and even consulted a store owner he thought was part of Lo's Hmong clan, seeking information about Lo, testimony showed.

Vue, who is no longer employed by the Sheriff's Department, is on trial for the Oct. 15, 2008 fatal shooting of Lo. Police and prosecutors allege that he hired two of his brothers - Gary and Chong Vue - to kill Lo because he was having an affair with Vue's wife.

Chu Vue is on trial with co-defendant and cousin Lang Vue, who is accused of aiding and abetting Gary and Chong Vue - who at the time were wanted for murder out of Minnesota - before and after the killing.

Gary and Chong Vue have since been convicted of the Minnesota murder, and will stand trial for Lo's murder separately.

Now in the trial's second week, Deputy District Attorney Eric Kindall covered a variety of topics today with nearly a dozen witnesses, including a sheriff's crime scene investigator that testified he ran a license plate for Chu Vue after the deputy said a car nearly hit him outside of a gym.

"I remember I saw the name," CSI Van Truong said of the vehicle's registered owner. "It was an Asian name."

Department of Justice records later confirmed it was Lo's license plate that Vue had asked him to run.

Truong testified that when he read about Lo's fatal shooting in the newspaper, he "made the connection" to the earlier incident with Vue and notified supervisors, who then called Sacramento police homicide detectives.

Tony Lao, who owns a market on Rio Linda Boulevard, testified that Vue once stopped in to ask if Lao knew Lo, saying he had a friend in Fresno who wanted to become a correctional officer and might benefit from talking with Lo. Vue indicated the men might know each other, Lao testified, because he thought they were part of the same Hmong clan. Lao did not know Lo, and never heard from Vue again, he said in court.

Kevin Paltzer, a senior information technology analyst for the Sheriff's Department, testified about records showing Vue had accessed law enforcement databases to run variations of the name "Steve Lo" in a number of searches spanning August and September 2008.

Vue was fired from the Sheriff's Department after he failed to cooperate with an internal affairs investigation stemming from those allegations.

As the day's testimony reached an end, Sacramento Police Officer Anne Marie Howland began discussing the "hundreds of hours" she and a handful of officers spent reviewing surveillance footage from a camera owned by one of Lo's neighbors.

Some of that video will be shown in court Tuesday, and, based on previous statements by police and prosecutors, is likely to show footage of Vue casing the neighborhood.

Also covered in today's testimony:

- The renting of Sacramento hotel rooms by Lang Vue and Chu Vue's sister, Allyssa Vue, who already has pleaded out in the case. The prosecution suspects those rooms were rented for Chu Vue's wanted brothers.

- The purchase of a black sports utility vehicle, possibly by Lang Vue and another man.

- Chu Vue's sudden closure of a bank account after he purchased a cashier's check for more than $10,000. According to Bank of America records shown in court today, that money came largely from two cash advanced Vue took from credit cards. Testimony showed only that the cashier's check was later deposited into a different bank account.

- Allegations from a man who did work for a man named "John" - identified in court as Chu Vue - that Vue had refused to pay him, saying he didn't have to pay because "I'm a sheriff." Jose Escamilla testified he had done work for Vue on a mobile home in Corning that prosecutors allege housed Gary and Chong Vue while they were on the run from Minnesota authorities.

Department of Justice records later confirmed it was Lo's license plate that Vue had asked Truong to run.

Truong testified that when he read about Lo's fatal shooting in the newspaper, he "made the connection" to the earlier incident with Vue and called supervisors, who then called homicide detectives.

Police and prosecutors allege that Vue arranged for Lo's killing because the correctional officer was having an affair with Vue's wife, Chia Vue, who worked with Lo at the California Medical Facility in Vacaville.

Vue's co-defendant and cousin, 27-year-old Lang Vue, is accused of aiding and abetting the killing by providing the accused gunmen -- Chu Vue's brothers, Gary and Chong Vue -- with rental cars, motel rooms and a getaway vehicle.

Gary Vue, 29, and Chong Vue, 31, will be tried separately on murder charges.

Chu Vue's defense attorney, Donald Masuda, claims the affair had ended by the time Lo was killed and has argued that Gary and Chong Vue acted independently from Chu Vue.

Also this morning, the co-defendants' friend Khou Vue testified that she initially lied to investigators about Chu Vue's involvement in her purchase of a mobile home in Corning, where police allege Chu Vue hid his brothers, who were wanted for murder in Minnesota. They have since been convicted in that case.

She testified that she was lying when she told detectives in initial interviews that she had bought the mobile home for her parents and that Chu Vue had nothing to do with the purchase. Khou Vue said she lied to protect herself.

During testimony Friday, Khou Vue said she made the purchase for Chu Vue because she thought it would improve her credit rating. Cross-examined today by Masuda, she confirmed she also aided him because he was well-regarded in her Hmong clan and that she had been taught to respect her elders.

She indicated that Chu Vue had impressed those in his clan by earning a deputy sheriff's badge and was viewed as an example of being a successful Hmong immigrant in America.

Khou Vue initially faced charges in connection with the case but struck a deal with the District Attorney's Office to have the charges dropped in exchange for truthful testimony.

Call The Bee's Kim Minugh, (916) 321-1038.

Previous coverage:

Victim's daughter disputes defense's breakup claim - Aug. 13, 2010

Co-worker says he warned slaying victim to 'watch out for woman's husband - Aug. 12, 2010

Shooting victim's wife provides emotional testimony during Vue trial - Aug. 11, 2010

Younger brother blamed as Sacramento murder trial begins - Aug. 10, 2010

Judge unseals some documents in ex-deputy's murder case - June 10, 2010

Killer expected to testify against brother in Sacramento murder trial - June 3, 2010

Death penalty won't be sought in slaying of California correctional officer - March 14, 2010

Defendant's sister convicted as accessory in California correctional officer's killing - Feb. 23, 2010

Sacramento County DA won't seek death penalty in guard's killing - Jan. 15, 2010

Suspect in California prison guard's killing is convicted of Minnesota murder - Dec. 12, 2009

Death penalty ruled out in ex-Sacramento deputy's murder trial - Nov. 21, 2009

Fired Sacramento County sheriff's deputy to face murder trial - Sept. 24, 2009

Elaborate scheme to kill correctional officer, judge told - Sept. 23, 2009

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories