Sacto 9-1-1

Chu Vue[1].jpgBy Andy Furillo
afurillo@sacbee.com

The wife of a state correctional officer shot and killed in his garage nearly two years ago testified today about seeing her husband sprawled out unconscious on the concrete floor and bleeding profusely from the wound to his forehead that ended his life barely four hours later.

Sia Vang said she heard "a lot of commotion" in the garage just before 5 a.m. on Oct. 15, 2008, before she checked out the scene to discover that her husband, Steve Lo, leaning against a wall, "was really hurt."

"He wasn't moving," Vang said. "He was bleeding from the back of his head. I pulled him down so he was flat on his back ... I checked his pulse ... I was hovering over him ... I panicked."

Lo, 39, died just before 9 a.m. that day of a single gunshot wound to the head.

Police and prosecutors say that former Sacramento sheriff's deputy Chu Vue planned the killing because his wife was having an affair with Lo.

Vue, 45, is now facing murder charges in Sacramento Superior Court. A cousin of Vue's, Lang Vue, 27, is on trial with him.

Vue's two younger brothers, Gary and Chong Vue, also have been charged but will be tried separately.

Gary Vue, 29, and Chong Vue, 31, are accused of carrying out what Deputy District Attorney Eric Kindall has characterized as the "assassination" of Lo.

The victim's wife testified she suspected he was having an affair and that she confronted him about it. She said Lo at first denied the extramarital relationship.

"He said I was crazy," Vang told the jury.

Under cross-examination from Chu Vue's attorney, Donald Masuda, Vang said her husband would later indirectly admit to the affair and that he agreed to change his work hours and stop working so much overtime at the California Medical Facility in Vacaville.

Chu Vue's wife, Chia, also was employed at the prison as a medical technical assistant.

Prosecutors say that Lo and Chia Vue had met at the Rodeway Inn in West Sacramento as recently as 10 days before he was killed.

Also today, investigators from Minnesota and Sacramento County testified about questioning Gary Vue in March 2006 about a murder in Minneapolis in 2001.

Gary Vue admitted to the slaying in a videotaped interview. Investigators were forced to let him go because they told him beforehand that he was not under arrest and was free to leave at any time during their questioning of him.

The investigators obtained an arrest warrant for Gary Vue later that day, but he had fled in the meantime.

When officers went to take him into custody, Sacramento sheriff's Det. Dan Cabral testified that Chu Vue, who had been on a sheriff's task force to track his brother down, was at the south area residence where they thought the younger brother was staying.

Cabral testified that he told Chu Vue of his brother's admission in the interview that day.

Chu Vue then "made a comment he was going to whip his ass," Cabral said. "I advised him to leave it alone."

Call The Bee's Andy Furillo, (916) 321-1141.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories