Sacto 9-1-1

By Andy Furillo
afurillo@sacbee.com

Chu Vue testified today that his wanted-for-murder brothers found out that his wife was breaking up with her lover and that he heard one of them say, "This guy knows too much."

The former Sacramento sheriff deputy's statement about his brothers came at the end of a day of testimony where he denied having anything to do with the killing of state correctional officer Steve Lo.

Defense attorney Donald Masuda said in his opening statement to the jury at the outset of trial that Vue's younger brother Gary Vue killed Lo on his own because he thought the officer was going to turn in the brothers.

Chu Vue[1].jpgVue (left) testified that he had been telling his younger brothers Gary and Chong Vue himself to turn themselves in for a 2001 murder in Minnesota for which they were ultimately convicted.

In a phone conversation with his brothers a few days before Steve Lo's death, Chu Vue said he told Chong Vue about the end of his wife Chia Vue's affair with Lo.

"Chong said, 'Can we trust this guy Steve Lo?'" Chu Vue testified. "I said, 'I don't know, but you guys leave it alone. Go back to Minnesota.'"

The testimony did not explain why the brothers would have had a problem with Lo. But Vue testified earlier in the day that Chia Vue knew the brothers were murder fugitives.

Masuda also suggested in his opening statement last month that Lo would have known about the brothers' circumstances through Chia Vue.

Vue testified that he then heard his brother Gary say in the background, about Lo, "This guy knows too much."

In earlier testimony, Chu Vue admitted that it was his truck depicted at least twice driving down Steve Lo's street in the month before the state correctional officer was shot and killed in the garage of his south Sacramento home.

But Vue said he had good reason to be driving down Tambor Way - his wife, Chia Vue, was having an affair with Lo, and he was checking to see if she was there.

Authorities say surveillance videos on the block captured Vue's vehicle on two other occasions driving down Lo's street, but Vue said he was not sure it was his truck.

Police and prosecutors say it was Chu Vue's anger and jealousy over his wife Chia Vue's affair with Lo that drove him to arrange for his two younger brothers to carry out the fatal Oct. 15, 2008, shooting.

Authorities say Vue was casing Lo's home when he conducted his drive-bys. He testified today that was not the case.

When he drove by Lo's house on Sept. 16, 2008, he said that he and his wife had already informed their two younger children they were getting a divorce. He said he drove by the house that day "to see if she was out there."

On Sept. 24, 2008, Vue said he was supposed to meet his wife at a gym not far from Lo's house but that she didn't show up.

"I didn't see her at the workout," he said. "After I did my workout, I figured I'd drive by and check if she was there." He told the jury, "I was just looking for her."

Vue is expected to spend the rest of the afternoon testifying in his Sacramento Superior Court trial in front of Judge Steve White.

Vue said in his morning testimony today that his wife admitted that she was having an affair with Lo when he asked her about mysterious telephone numbers that were showing up on their monthly bills.

Chia Vue told him in early September 2008 that their marriage was finished.

"We're through," he said she told him in a phone message. "I will leave you everything - the house, the kids. I will start a new life with someone," Vue quoted his wife as saying.

He said she also admitted she was having sexual encounters with several other employees at the California Medical Facility in Vacaville, where Chia Vue and Steve Lo also worked.

Also in his testimony today, Vue tried to explain why his two younger brothers who were wanted for a 2001 murder in Minnesota were living in a mobile home on a 20-acre piece of property he bought - surreptitiously, under a relative's name -- in 2007, near Corning in Tehama County.

He said his younger brothers Gary Vue and Chong Vue had contacted him from a place they were hiding out near Fresno. He said he spoke to Chong Vue and told him he needed to go back to Minnesota and turn himself in.

But Chu Vue said he offered to let the two of them stay at the Corning property until he got back from a vacation in Laos in late 2007 when "we could resolve the issue."

"I know it was harboring," Vue said, admitting to the felony violation of harboring his brothers who were wanted fugitives at the time on the murder warrant out of Minneapolis.

Vue said he acquired the property in the first place to use as a base for his hunting and fishing hobbies.

The former deputy, under questioning from his attorney, Donald Masuda, also sought to undercut the prosecution's contention that he and his brother Gary were close enough to carry out a murder plot together by testifying that they had a lousy relationship.

Vue said he first helped send Gary Vue off to Minnesota when the younger brother got into gang activity in Sacramento as a youth. When he found out Gary was involved in a murder in Minnesota, he said he exploded.

"I talked to him and I said, 'Why do you do the same thing over and over again?'" Vue testified. "He said f-- off. Get out of my business...So I beat him up."

He said he told Gary Vue in a later conversation, "I hope you go to prison for life."

Chu Vue said his conversation with Gary Vue took place in mid-2006, after he first learned that Gary and Chong were wanted for the Minnesota for which they were later convicted.

Call The Bee's Andy Furillo, (916) 321-1141.

Previous coverage:

Defendant Chu Vue takes stand in murder trial - Sept. 8, 2010

Sex life of murder suspect's wife will be aired at Vue trial - Sept. 3, 2010

'Other' defendant in Chu Vue murder case testifies, denies role in killing - Sept. 2, 2010

Prosecution calls its wrap-up witness in Chu Vue murder trial - Sept. 1, 2010

Cell phone tracking shows suspects near officer's killing - Aug. 24, 2010

Sister says Sacramento suspect knew who wife's lover was - Aug. 20, 2010

Sacramento murder trial told where two suspects were housed - Aug. 19, 2010

Chu Vue's cousin testifies about fugitives' visit at time of slaying - Aug. 18, 2010

Former deputy sought data on slain man, trial is told - Aug. 17, 2010

Victim's daughter disputes defense's breakup claim - Aug. 13, 2010

Co-worker says he warned slaying victim to 'watch out for woman's husband - Aug. 12, 2010

Shooting victim's wife provides emotional testimony during Vue trial - Aug. 11, 2010

Younger brother blamed as Sacramento murder trial begins - Aug. 10, 2010

Judge unseals some documents in ex-deputy's murder case - June 10, 2010

Killer expected to testify against brother in Sacramento murder trial - June 3, 2010

Death penalty won't be sought in slaying of California correctional officer - March 14, 2010

Defendant's sister convicted as accessory in California correctional officer's killing - Feb. 23, 2010

Sacramento County DA won't seek death penalty in guard's killing - Jan. 15, 2010

Suspect in California prison guard's killing is convicted of Minnesota murder - Dec. 12, 2009

Death penalty ruled out in ex-Sacramento deputy's murder trial - Nov. 21, 2009

Fired Sacramento County sheriff's deputy to face murder trial - Sept. 24, 2009

Elaborate scheme to kill correctional officer, judge told - Sept. 23, 2009

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories