Sacto 9-1-1

By Bee Staff

A 46-year-old man who engaged a Placer County Sheriff's Office SWAT team in a gunbattle in Newcastle in 2006 was found guilty today of 10 felony counts of attempted murder and 10 felony counts of assault with a firearm on peace officers.

virgophoto.jpgThe jury also found David Allan Virgo (photo left) guilty of two felony counts of being a felon in possession of firearms, according to a news release from the Placer County District Attorney's Office.

Despite the fact that 50 to 70 shots were exchanged between the officers and Virgo, who was barricaded inside a home, no one was hit by the gunfire. Virgo eventually surrendered when a teargas canister was shot into the home, the release states.

The jury's 22-count verdict culminated a month-long trial for Virgo in Placer County Superior Court. The defendant, a resident of Applegate, faces at least 35 years in a state prison, said prosecutor Jeff Wilson of the Placer County District Attorney's Office.

"After these verdicts, I anticipate that Mr. Virgo will never get out of prison and never get another chance to kill a peace officer," Wilson said outside the courtroom.

During the trial, it was established that Virgo, who had a history of weapons violations and who was considered by his parole officer as "unpredictable," was being sought by law enforcement officers on an arrest warrant for assaulting another man and threatening the person with a handgun, Wilson said.

On the night of Oct. 18, 2006, Placer County sheriff's officers tracked Virgo to a home on Happy Hollow Lane in Newcastle. The sheriff's Special Enforcement Team, similar to a SWAT team, responded and 10 members of the unit surrounded the home, the release states.

Leaders of the SET team were aware of Virgo's reputation for being unpredictable and that he'd once boasted of being an enforcer for a Hell's Angels unit known as the "Filthy Few," according to the release.

But before the SET members could make peaceful contact with Virgo, another man who was staying at the house was outside on a phone call and spotted two of the SET members approaching the home.

Despite the two officers' attempts to explain that they were from the sheriff's office and were looking for Virgo, the man backed away and went into the house to warn others in the home that officers were outside.

Soon after, shots were heard coming from inside the house. Officers responded by shooting out a floodlight that illuminated the outside yard. During subsequent exchange of gunfire, five unarmed persons came out the front door and crawled to safety, the release states.

Virgo remained alone in the home exchanging shots with the officers.

Officers testified that Virgo could be heard yelling that he had explosives and that he would "blow the place up. I'll kill everyone." But the lobbing of teargas into the home ended the standoff.

Wilson, the prosecutor, praised the SET members.

"Just because our peace officers anticipate that they may be shot at in the line of duty does not mean we should tolerate the defendant's behavior," Wilson said. "Obviously, the jury agreed.

"The evidence presented at trial showed the SET members demonstrated the highest level of professionalism and expertise in bringing a dangerous situation to a conclusion without serious injury to anyone," Wilson said. "They should be commended for doing an exceptional job."

The trial jury deliberated for one full day on Tuesday, reaching their verdicts late that afternoon, the release states.

Placer County Superior Court Judge Colleen Nichols ordered them to return this morning to announce their decision.

In addition to finding Virgo guilty on the multiple counts of attempted murder and assault with a firearm on peace officers, the jury determined that a total of 50 special allegations that the defendant used firearms and acted with premeditation were true.

The special allegations could enhance the sentence that Nichols will hand out on Nov. 19 when Virgo, who is in custody in the county jail without bail, returns to court for sentencing.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories