Sacto 9-1-1

By Andy Furillo
afurillo@sacbee.com

Chu Vue began testifying in his own defense this afternoon at his murder trial, giving a brief recitation of Hmong culture and beliefs before the trial wrapped up for the day.

The former Sacramento sheriff's deputy is scheduled to be back on the witness stand when the trial resumes Wednesday in front of Superior Court Judge Steve White.

Dressed in a blue suit and chained to his chair, Vue did not get into any of the key details of the case in his 20 minutes on the stand during which he was questioned by his attorney, Donald Masuda.

He testified about how he was born in Laos, moved to the United States at age 13, went to school in Sacramento, got his bachelor's degree from Sacramento State and worked for the Sheriff's Department for 13 years.

The 45-year-old defendant's employment with the agency came to an end following the Oct. 15, 2008, shooting death of California correctional officer Steve Lo in the garage of his Tambor Way home in south Sacramento.

Authorities charged Vue with setting up the killing because Lo was having an affair with the former deputy's wife, Chia Vue.

Also charged in the case is Vue's fellow Hmong clan member, Lang Vue, 27, who is accused of renting motel rooms and cars and buying a vehicle for the allgeded gunmen - Chu Vue's younger brothers, Gary Vue, 29, and Chong Vue, 31.

The two younger Vues were wanted for a murder in Minnesota at the time of Lo's death. They have since been convicted in that case.

They are waiting to stand trial on murder charges in the Lo killing.

Chu Vue described growing up in a small village of about 15 families in Laos, one where there was no running water or electricity. He described how the Hmong culture is rooted in the spiritual belief that their ancestors look over them after they die.

"That's what we believe and worship," he said.

The spiritual aspect of the culture figures to come into play later in his testimony when it comes time for Vue to explain his many phone calls to his younger brothers around the time that Lo was killed.

Previous witnesses have testified that the Vue clan had just experienced the deaths of two of its elders around the time of Lo's killing and that Chu Vue, as a respected leader in the group, had the responsibility to help direct the funeral arrangements.

Also today, Chu Vue's lawyer said he no longer intends to call the defendant's wife to testify about her extra-martial affairs. But Masuda still asked the judge to force her to appear in court to show the jury she's good looking.

The prosecutor objected to putting Chia Vue on exhibition in front of the jury as if she were "a Kewpie doll."

Superior Court Judge Steve White agreed and turned down Masuda's request.

In arguing to present Chia Vue to the jury, Masuda said the panel is "entitled to see what she looks like." Masuda has alleged that she had numerous affairs before and after Lo's death and that her husband's motive to kill could be lessened in the eyes of the jury if it knew the extent of her extramarital sexual activity.

Masuda added that "I want to show she's an attractive lady."

White said that Chia Vue "is not an exhibition or a prop."

"She's she's not going to be hauled in here every time a reference to her is made," White said.

The judge said a picture of Chia Vue has already been entered as an exhibit in the case, but Masuda said the Department of Motor Vehicles photo doesn't do justice to the woman's looks.

Deputy District Attorney Eric Kindall, meanwhile, said bringing Chia Vue into court to be seen only and not heard would be an abuse of the subpoena process.

"Subpoenas are supposed to be used to compel witnesses to testify in a court of law, not to be an exhibit in a case," Kindall said.

Kindall chided Masuda for criticizing the DMV photo of Chia Vue while in his opening statement showing a picture of her having sex with Steve Lo. The prosecutor characterized the photo taken on the victim's cell phone as "hideous."

He protested Masuda's effort "to bring her in like a Kewpie doll." Such a move is intended "to humiliate her," Kindall said.

Also at trial today, one correctional employee testified that he had an affair with Chia Vue that involved two sexual encounters in 2006 and 2007.

Call The Bee's Andy Furillo, (916) 321-1141.

Previous coverage:

Sex life of murder suspect's wife will be aired at Vue trial - Sept. 3, 2010

'Other' defendant in Chu Vue murder case testifies, denies role in killing - Sept. 2, 2010

Prosecution calls its wrap-up witness in Chu Vue murder trial - Sept. 1, 2010

Cell phone tracking shows suspects near officer's killing - Aug. 24, 2010

Sister says Sacramento suspect knew who wife's lover was - Aug. 20, 2010

Sacramento murder trial told where two suspects were housed - Aug. 19, 2010

Chu Vue's cousin testifies about fugitives' visit at time of slaying - Aug. 18, 2010

Former deputy sought data on slain man, trial is told - Aug. 17, 2010

Victim's daughter disputes defense's breakup claim - Aug. 13, 2010

Co-worker says he warned slaying victim to 'watch out for woman's husband - Aug. 12, 2010

Shooting victim's wife provides emotional testimony during Vue trial - Aug. 11, 2010

Younger brother blamed as Sacramento murder trial begins - Aug. 10, 2010

Judge unseals some documents in ex-deputy's murder case - June 10, 2010

Killer expected to testify against brother in Sacramento murder trial - June 3, 2010

Death penalty won't be sought in slaying of California correctional officer - March 14, 2010

Defendant's sister convicted as accessory in California correctional officer's killing - Feb. 23, 2010

Sacramento County DA won't seek death penalty in guard's killing - Jan. 15, 2010

Suspect in California prison guard's killing is convicted of Minnesota murder - Dec. 12, 2009

Death penalty ruled out in ex-Sacramento deputy's murder trial - Nov. 21, 2009

Fired Sacramento County sheriff's deputy to face murder trial - Sept. 24, 2009

Elaborate scheme to kill correctional officer, judge told - Sept. 23, 2009

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories