Sacto 9-1-1

By Cathy Locke
clocke@sacbee.com

yolanda fryson.jpgA former Yuba County Child Protective Services worker who falsely accused a Placer County man of child molestation in an extortion attempt has been sentenced to prison.

Yolanda Perez Fryson (left), 43, of Rocklin was found guilty of extortion, forgery and fraud during a jury trial.

On Wednesday, Placer Superior Court Judge Joseph O'Flaherty, sentenced her to nine years and four months in prison, calling her extortion attempt "close to the worst crime I've seen in my 21 years on the bench."

The victim, a 40-year-old Roseville man, attended the sentencing and fought back tears as he told the court how being falsely accused of child molestation had turned his world upside down, according to a Placer County District Attorney's Office news release.

The release gave this account:

The man said he spent "three days of hell" wondering what to do and kept imagining being led away in handcuffs by police or having people point to him in the false belief that he was a child molester. The man said he briefly contemplated suicide.

The man eventually told an attorney about Fryson's accusation. The attorney referred him to the Placer County Sheriff's Office, which set up a sting operation in which the victim met with Fryson in a parking lot to hand over $10,000 in exchange for dropping the alleged molestation issue.

Fryson was immediately arrested when she accepted the money.

At the time, Fryson was on administrative leave from the Yuba County Child Protective Services Office because of an arrest for a check kiting scheme, in which a person deposits worthless checks into bank accounts and quickly withdraws money before the insufficient funds can be confirmed, the release states.

During the extortion attempt on the Roseville man, Fryson, who was on leave from her job and out on bail for the check fraud charge, displayed her CPS badge, which she had previously reported lost or stolen.

Prosecutor Stephanie Macumber of the Placer County District Attorney's Office said Fryson continued to commit crimes even after the extortion and check kiting incidents. Again out on bail and attempting to get out of the check fraud charges, Fryson forged a letter absolving her of wrongdoing and signed the name of a 29-year bank employee, Macumber said.

Fryson also pressured at least two other bank employees to write letters stating that the overdrafts were bank errors and not her fault, Macumber said.

Fryson's trial on 16 felony counts took place in October. The jury on Nov. 1 returned guilty verdicts on all counts, including attempted extortion, check fraud, falsifying evidence, forgery and accepting a bribe.

Call The Bee's Cathy Locke, (916) 321-5287.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories