Sacto 9-1-1

By Andy Furillo
afurillo@sacbee.com

With Facebook facing a possible contempt of court citation, attorneys for the social networking giant have apologized for the company's failure to appear at Sacramento court hearing last month where defense lawyers had sought a juror's posted musings in a gang-beating case.

The defense lawyers said the Facebook employee who processes subpoenas failed to see that the demands for the postings came with an attached court order.

Despite the apology, the Facebook lawyers in court papers filed last week refused to turn over the juror's posted remarks. They said that such a disclosure would violate the federal Stored Communications Act.

Another hearing on the request for the postings is scheduled for Friday in front of Sacramento Superior Court Judge Michael P. Kenny.

The judge last month issued an order to show cause why Facebook should not be held in contempt after no company representative appeared in court on Dec. 17 on the defense motion to obtain the postings.

Former U.S. Attorney McGregor Scott was one of the two Facebook attorneys from the firm of Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe who filed the papers last week.

"This was just a matter of inadvertence and oversight and there was nothing purposeful by Facebook in overlooking the subpoena," said Scott, who used to head the federal prosecution office for the Eastern District of California.

Mike Wise, the Sacramento lawyer for one of the five accused gang members who subpoenaed the postings, hunkered down with the Facebook papers today to prepare a response.

Wise said the attorneys still want the postings and that the company's refusal to turn them over could create "a bit of a Constitutional issue."

"A criminal defendant has a right to compulsory process," Wise said.

Facebook's court papers said the company "apologizes for any inconvenience incurred by the court and the parties that resulted from its administrative error."

The apology was contained in a motion by the company to quash the subpoena filed by the defense lawyers in the Killa Mobb gang case. Five purported members of the gang were convicted last year in the 2008 Halloween Night beating of a man in a gas station near the Arden Fair Mall.

During the trial, a juror posted on his Facebook page that he was on the jury and he mentioned in one message that the proceedings at time became boring.

The defense lawyers subpoenaed Facebook for all of the juror's postings in the trial, as well as any that may have been sent to him by his friends concerning the trial. They said they were concerned that his friends' comments may have affected his decision in the case.

In their court papers, the Facebook lawyers said the 1986 Stored Communications Action precludes them from providing the information. They said that exceptions to the act, which was passed by Congress with the intent of protecting Internet privacy, would allow them to furnish the information only under a court order sought by a governmental agency.

They also said the juror, Arturo Ramirez, would be free to provide the information to the defense lawyers on his own and that they would be "happy" to help him retrieve the postings if he gave his consent.

Ramirez said in a previous interview with The Bee that he had no problem turning the information over to the defense lawyers.

Call The Bee's Andy Furillo, (916) 321-1141.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories