Sacto 9-1-1

By Sam Stanton
sstanton@sacbee.com

Former real estate executive Michael Lyon will have to do time in jail rather than serve a year of home confinement following his guilty plea last month to four felony counts.

Sacramento County Sheriff Scott Jones said today he had rejected Lyon's application to serve his sentence under home arrest with an electronic monitoring device attached to his ankle. Lyon and his attorney had expected routine approval of the request, which would have allowed Lyon to go to work each day and to conduct visits with doctors and run other errands.

"The facts of his offense caused me grave concerns," Jones said, adding that he had received letters from alleged Lyon victims urging him to order Lyon to jail. Jones said the fact that Lyon's crimes occurred in his home -- and that one of them occurred after Lyon knew he was under investigation -- played into his decision. He also said the fact that Lyon's behavior allegedly went back decades and involved numerous victims was a factor.

Jones did not specify how much time Lyon will have to serve, but said his conduct in custody at Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center will be reviewed after 30 days. Typically, a one-year sentence results in about 180 days of time served. If Lyon serves less than that in jail, he will be required to finish his sentence in home detention.

Lyon issued a statement in response to the sheriff's decision that indicated he was not surprised by the decision.

"It's with a sense of resolve that I greet today's news by repaying my debt to society," he said. "I appreciate that the district attorney and sheriff have treated me fairly throughout this difficult process.

"Deep down, I knew this day could eventually come, and it is a relief that I will now begin to pay the price for my poor behavior. I look forward to ending this chapter and rebuilding my family and life."

Lyon pleaded guilty to electronic eavesdropping, charges that stemmed from his secret videotaping of interactions he had with four prostitutes he hired from online services, who are identified in court documents as "Jane Doe" 1-4. As part of the March 14 plea, Sacramento Superior Court Judge Gary Ransom sentenced Lyon to two years in prison, then suspended the sentence and said he would require a year in custody.

The court indicated it had "no objection" to Lyon serving the sentence at home, and Lyon and his attorney, William Portanova, expected the sentence would be spent at Lyon's home, which Portanova said is a typical sentence for a first-time felon with no history of violence.

"While Sheriff Jones and I disagree on the need for Mike's incarceration, the sheriff did win the election and therefore has the final word on the matter," he after learning of Jones' decision.

Prosecutor Rob Gold said at the time of Lyon's plea that the District Attorney's office opposed the request for home detention, and the prosecution's sentencing brief said Lyon should serve jail time "in view of the nature and seriousness of the crimes."

Court records indicate that Lyon secretly recorded a 19-year-old escort on March 21, 2009, at the Arden Arcade home he shared with his then-wife Kimarie "Kim" Lyon. The woman told investigators she did not know she was being recorded and, at one point in the recording, points to the hidden camera and asks what it is, court records state.

"Nothing," Lyon responded, adding that it was not a camera, the documents state.

The next victim, a 24-year-old escort, was recorded on Jan. 27-28, 2009, in the same bedroom, and was shown the recording on Oct. 4, 2010, by investigators.

"She cried when she observed the video and identified herself as being depicted in it," court records state.

A third victim, a 33-year-old escort, was recorded Oct. 8, 2008, at Lyon's home and is depicted on six different videos, the documents state, including a lengthy recording of the two.

"In the beginning of the long video, the defendant can be seen adjusting the camera prior to Jane Doe #3's arrival," the documents state.

The fourth victim was a 22-year-old escort recorded inside Lyon's current home in Carmichael, the documents state, and the incident occurred about Sept. 13, 2010, "at a time when defendant Lyon knew he was being investigated for secretly recording sexual encounters with women and while his representatives were publicly denying such conduct on his behalf," court documents state.

"Each of the women secretly videotaped in the charged offenses expressed feeling violated and betrayed by defendant's conduct," the prosecution's sentencing brief indicates.

The brief also describes "a pattern of similar misconduct" going back more than 20 years that was not charged because the statute of limitations had run out.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories