Sacto 9-1-1

By Peter Hecht
phecht@sacbee.com

With accused killer Steven Paul Colver on the witness stand, a prosecutor today put a gruesome photo of Joanne Witt's face and her knife-ravaged neck on a projection screen, aggressively challenging his version that he only arrived after she was dead.

A day after Colver testified he nudged the leg of Joanne Witt with his palm to check on her after the El Dorado Hills mother was stabbed by her then 14-year-old daughter, Tyar Marie Witt, prosecutor Lisette Suder bore into him in a blistering exchange over how he happened to touch the victim exactly where male DNA was later found on her body.

"You would admit that face is very obviously the face of a dead woman," the El Dorado County deputy district attorney sternly said to Colve as she gestured to the grim crime scene photo.

"Yes, ma'am," Colver replied.

"So you had to touch her body above the knee to make sure she was dead?" Suder continued.


"I did not see her face when I went into her room," he answered.

"So you had to touch her right ... where there was male DNA found," the prosecutor went on.

"No ma'am," Colver replied.

The pointed cross-examination challenged the version Colver offered of the crime on the witness stand in El Dorado County Superior Court after the prosecution had introduced evidence that male DNA was found beneath Joanne Witt's finger tips and amid bloody streaks on her thigh.

Colver testified Thursday that it was Tylar Witt who killed her mother and that the girl greeted him at her house carrying a blooding knife and telling him, "I did it. I finally did it."

Prosecutors say Colver murdered Witt by himself, stabbing her at least 20 times after Tylar summoned him to her house. Earlier Joanne Witt had given her daughter's diary to police as part of a statutory rape complaint against Colver, then 19.

Colver said Friday he touched Witt in the leg after the killing and also testified that he handled a bloody kitchen knife after he took it from her daughter. A day earlier, he testified at length of scratching and petting Joanne Witt's dogs in an afternoon visit to the house while Joanne Witt was at work - hours before her murder.

Defense attorney Robert Blaiser, a DNA specialist known for his work in the O.J. Simpson murder trial, Thursday had challenged testimony of California Department of Justice senior criminologist Deanna Kacer over how male DNA - in quantities insufficient to determine it was Colver's - was found on Joanne Witt's body.

Blaiser argued that the DNA could have been transmitted to Witt without her having any direct contact with another person. Kacer testified that the DNA - taken from scrapings beneath Joanne Witt's finger nails - could only have been acquired through direct contact and was consisted with evidence of someone fending off an attacker.

Colver faces 25 years to life if convicted of first-degree murder in Joanne Witt's death and could be denied parole if a jury determines he was lying in wait before the murder and killed her as a witness in the statutory rape case. Tylar Witt, now 16, pleaded guilty to second-degree murder in a deal that could make her eligible for parole at 29 if it is determined she cooperated with authorities.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Q: What happened with the case regarding Marc McCormick? He was accused of videotaping a woman in her home and was arrested. He lives in my neighborhood and I see him all the time. Were charges dropped?


A: According to Sacramento Superior Court online records, misdemeanor charges have been filed against Mark William McCormick, alleging that he used a camcorder or other instrument to view an individual in a place where there was an expectation of privacy, trespassing and peeping.

His next court date is June 4.

According to Sacramento police logs, McCormick, 40, was arrested March 8 after the victim reported that a friend had entered her home without her knowledge to secretly videotape her.


715 questions answered | Submit a question

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories