Sacto 9-1-1
July 17, 2012
Feds announce settlement details in Moonlight Fire

By Denny Walsh
dwalsh@sacbee.com

U. S. Attorney Benjamin Wagner announced this morning what he described as the largest recovery - $122.5 million - ever obtained by the government for damages caused by a wildfire.

In what Wagner described as a "creative' settlement, he said the defendants in the government's lawsuit will pay $55 million in cash and Sierra Pacific Industries Inc., targeted as the most culpable defendant and the largest private landholder in California, will convey 22,500 acres of its land to the United States.

Wagner said that land is conservatively valued at $3,000 an acre.

The Moonlight fire ignited on Labor Day of 2007 and raged across the northeast sector of the state for two weeks, laying waste to 65,000 acres in Plumas and Lassen counties, including 46,000 acres of national forest. It was one of the most devastating wildfires in California history.

The government blames a bulldozer driver employed by a logging company that was, in turn, hired by Sierra Pacific on a timber project for starting the fire on private property.

William Warne, the Sacramento attorney who was lead outside counsel for Sierra Pacific in the suit, said in a teleconference this afternoon: "My clilent believes it had nothing to do with the fire."

He said Sierra Pacific signed off on the settlement because it is very favorable to the company, because juries are unpredictable, and because a recent ruling by U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller found that the compay may be legally liable for the fire even if it had nothing to do with its origin.

On the other hand, Warne, said he is confident Sierra Pacific, with a level playing field, would have had a strong chance of prevailing at trial on the issue of liability.

He said a defense investigation turned up misconduct and ineptness on the part of U.S. fire investigators that left the government's case on liability "in tatters."

Warne also emphasized that California law needs to be changed in order to reign in overzealous federal prosecutors who go after private entities for huge damages that can wipe out businesses and cost jobs.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About Sacto 9-1-1

Sacto 9-1-1 is a blog on crime and emergency services news in the Sacramento region.

Send feedback on Sacto 9-1-1 to Assistant Metro Editor Anthony Sorci at asorci@sacbee.com

Subscribe to Breaking News Alerts

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Sacto 9-1-1 Q&A

Bee reporters answer questions about area crime news, trends and other issues. QUESTION: What happened in court to Michael Gomes, who was one of the men accused of the Mariposa County gem heist? Submitted by: Elizabeth, Auburn ANSWER: Michael Anthony Gomes, 43, was arrested in January at his Citrus Heights (Read More)

More Questions and Answers
See all the crime Q&As
Submit your question

May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives


Kim Minugh on Twitter

Follow "Kim_Minugh" on Twitter

Local Agencies on Twitter

Categories