Appetizers
April 9, 2007
Napa Cabernet: A Status Report

The culinary highlight of the weekend was a blind tasting of six Napa Valley cabernet sauvignons from 2002. I chose this theme because cabernet sauvignon is California's most highly regarded varietal, with the best examples coming most consistently from Napa Valley. Often, however, I just don't get the excitement - or the prices - they prompt.

This group was no exception. All were premium or super-premium releases, ranging from $40 to $115. Collectively, they were fine wines, generally concentrated with ripe cherry flavors. A couple had notes of eucalyptus and mint. Just one was peculiar - soft, sweet and abrupt. The others were balanced and vibrant, with a couple downright elegant. But I was perplexed by their overall fleeting finishes. They were what they said they were, but they didn't have the complexity, buoyancy and length that made them especially exhilarating.

The consensus favorite - six tasters were involved - was the Hartwell Vineyards 2002 Napa Valley Stags Leap District Cabernet Sauvignon ($115), the most muscular and tannic wine in the flight. The fruit ran to ripe blackberries and cherries, and the structure was classic Stags Leap - sabre-like in combining resilence with spring. I liked its richness and ripeness, but I would have liked it even more had the tannins been mellower.

Coming in second overall was the Terra Valentine Vines 2002 Napa Valley Spring Mountain District Wurtele Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon ($50), notable for its lush and varied berry flavors, firm yet supple structure, and note of chocolate, a frequent trait of Spring Mountain cabernets.

The best buy finished third, the Silverado Vineyards 2002 Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon ($40), which I liked for its fresh smells of cherries, berries and plums, its fruity and slightly minty flavor, its balanced tannins, and its finish, the most resonating in the flight.

All the wines were double decanted, a step I usually avoid but in this instance used because of the youth of the wines and because of what I've been reading and hearing lately of the benefits of briefly aerating relatively new releases. Double decanting involves pouring the contents of each bottle into a decanter, then returning it to its original bottle.

The 2002 growing year in the Napa Valley, incidentally, started off apprehensively, with an April frost and May rains, but summer was mild, with warm days and cold nights. At harvest, the juice was lauded for its intense color and focused flavors. Each of these wines was fairly high in alcohol - around 14.5 percent - but none was harsh with heat.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


Recommended Links

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

June 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30