Raiders Blog and Q&A

News, observations and reader questions about the Oakland Raiders

January 17, 2008
Review of the rececivers

I’ve received a lot of input from fans on the Raiders need at defensive tackle and whether they’d pass on Darren McFadden if he’s available when the Raiders select.

As of now, I know the Raiders want to retain Justin Fargas. And while he won’t command the salary of a LaDainian Tomlinson, Fargas won’t come cheap.

This is further complicated by the Raiders mistake of not getting Michael Bush on the field to see if he is a potential franchise running back.

So unless Fargas isn’t resigned and Dominic Rhodes and LaMont Jordan are both released, I can’t see the Raiders going running back right now.

They would appear to be in a good position to trade down if McFadden is available when they select and save a lot of money.

Whether the Raiders pursue McFadden is a good question. However, there’s no debating the team needs to look at adding receivers.

Question: Jason, first off I read your blog daily, keep up the good job. I won’t hate on you about the "Al" thing.

My Question is about WR, In my opinion Porter is not and never has been a viable option at the #1 slot, Curry is a good #2 and great number #3, and beyond those two I don’t see anything good, So what are the Raiders to do? Draft one in the first two rounds, or pick up/trade for a proven Veteran? i.e. Chad Johnson or Roy Williams? I would love to see Williams in S&B (proven work ethic.) Thanks again
Jim, Mackinney, Tex.

Question: The only legitimate starting WR on our roster is Ronald Curry. How is it wide-receiver isn't the area of biggest need for the Raiders? We at least have some bodies on the defensive line.
Chris, Rocklin

Answer: I’ll address Chris’ question first. I’d say the defensive line is a bigger need because it’s the foundation of building a good defense, similar to an offense needing a good line.

And until the defensive line is addressed, the Raiders will continue to struggle stopping the run.

Now on to Jim’s question.

The coaching staff expected a big year from Curry that didn’t materialize. His 55 catches for 717 yards were both below his 2006 numbers.

That’s not all on Curry. The Raiders started three different quarterbacks. So that’s a big reason the passing game struggled at times and ranked 31st in the NFL.

Curry did have a number of uncharacteristic drops and false starts this season, too. But he’ll be the focus of the offense unless the Raiders acquire a player like Chad Johnson in a trade.

But if you believe Bengals coach Marvin Lewis Mr. Ocho Cinco isn’t going anywhere.

Also, the problem with that is the Raiders are short on draft picks, having dealt this year’s third round pick (to draft Mario Henderson) and a fifth round pick (to acquire Gerard Warren).

Also trading for a big name receiver means taking on a big contract and Kiffin is big on having salary flexibility.

I agree with Jim's assessment of Roy Williams. Al Davis nearly drafted him in 2004 when he picked Robert Gallery.

Making a deal for Williams makes more sense than Johnson.

Williams will be entering the final year of his contract and the Lions have a lot of money invested in Calvin Johnson. So if the Raiders can trade for him and agree to a new contract, not inherit one, it would be a wise move.

Jerry Porter is likely gone in free agency. Kiffin (admirably, I think) took blame along with the coaching staff for the lack of development in Johnnie Lee Higgins.

I think the Raiders hurt themselves by giving time to Tim Dwight, an aging vet that isn't likely to return in 2008, that could have been used to develop Higgins during his rookie season.

I fully expect Chris McFoy, a receiver from USC that was promoted to the active roster late in the season to be given a chance to make the 2008 team. Kiffin likes big receivers and McFoy is a physical player.

The Raiders need an impact receiver, so much so, I think it trumps the offensive line in order of need for the offense.

As far as the draft, the mock drafts I’ve seen have Cal and former Long Beach Poly star DeSean Jackson as the top receiver, but the Raiders wouldn’t take him at No. 3 or No. 4.

Others like Oklahoma’s Malcolm Kelly, Michigan’s Mario Manningham, Texas’ Limas Sweed and LSU’s Early Doucet are potential first-rounders if the Raiders trade down.

If one were to slip to the second round, they could step in and possibly start.

In free agency, Chicago’s Bernard Berrian, Jacksonville’s Ernest Wilford and Arizona’s Bryant Johnson are realistic targets. Players like New England’s Donte’ Stallworth could become available if their teams opt not to pay them large bonuses this spring.

The biggest free agent will be a certain receiver from New England with ties to Oakland.

But don’t look for Randy Moss to be back.

--Jason Jones

About Comments

Reader comments on are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.

About Raiders Blog and Q&A

Matt Kawahara was born in Sacramento and attended McClatchy High School and UC Berkeley, where he wrote for the independent student paper The Daily Californian. He graduated from Cal in 2010 and started at The Sacramento Bee as a summer intern. He joined The Bee's sports staff in fall 2011.

Raiders stories on

October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31