

"W are getting a lot more rockfall where things are not just glued together the way they were by snow and ice," Parker said. "That is certainly what they are seeing in Europe. The Matterhorn. The Eiger - all those things are falling down because you no longer have the rock glued together by ice deep in the cracks.
"What we are doing is we are starting to do snow and ice climbs earlier in the season. Because by fall, everything thing is gone," Parker said.
To read more about the impact of climate change on hiking and camping across northern California, check out John Soares' blog at: http://northerncaliforniahikingtrails.com/blog/
John is also co-author, along with his brother Marc, of 100 Classic Hikes in Northern California.




My recent report on the federal government's plan to log and burn juniper woodlands across northeast California - in the name of ecological restoration, energy independence and climate-friendly power - stirred a lively response in the comment section of the Bee's web page. Separately, I received a number of interesting responses. Here is a sampling:Hi Tom- I read your article and appreciated the topic. This is the same old Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service of our parents and grandparents. The underlying issue here is to make the land "more productive" for grazing. Back in the late '60s the BLM in Nevada were employing a technique called "chaining" where they would pull a huge ship's anchor chain between two bulldozers and uproot Junipers, pines, sagebrush, archeological sites and everything else in the way for miles and miles. Then they would plant crested wheatgrass and claim that they were changing a terminal ecosystem back to a productive range. This would appear to be the same goal with different techniques and scientific cover.
Not
sure about the carbon storage issue. Hard to believe sage and grass would store
more carbon than Juniper trees. But what do I know!
Thanks,
Eddie
Hard, Rosemont
--------------------------------
Tom: I am
always amazed at how things are rationalized. A recent study was done on the
Forest Service. One outcome was that the majority of Forest Service personnel
completed college more than 20 to 25 years ago. Concepts and understandings of
ecosystems, including juniper ecosystems have changed, while the Forest Service
continues the mantra of "EIS, clear cut, burn, pave it over, and paint it
green." No rational person intentionally creates moonscapes. As Aldo
Leopold said, you can read the health of an ecosystem in the landscape. These
horizontal "modified" juniper forests don't appear to be healthy, nor
are they able to sequester carbon. This is all in the quest of more non-native
grass for grazing. The native grasses were Nassella (formerly the genus Stipa)
or purple needlegrass. Removing junipers just ensures invasion by non-native
grasses - less nutrition, diversity and resilience. Juniper invasions occur when fire is
excluded. Fire has been suppressed for about 100 years. So now we are reaping
"old growth" junipers that would not have survived fire as seedlings.
Integral reoccurring wildland fire is threatening to many foresters - they
still buy into the Smokey Bear myths. Even when you use an increment borer to
core into trees to identify and date periodic fire episodes, foresters refuse
to accept what the evidence shows. Episodes such as this always seem to happen
"just out of the public view." This occurred on the Sequoia National
Forest where multiple Sequoiadendron (Sierra Big Tree) groves were aggressively
logged on eastern-facing slopes (away from the common public view). It was
Martin Litton and a few others, who noticed the unusual clear cuts - with snow
on the ground - from the perspective of a private plane. The Forest Service
ignored its own designations of "protected" groves, dragged logs
across sensitive roots, and made a general mess of things. A critical result
was the establishment of Giant Sequoia National Monument - and still the Forest
Service cannot understand or believe things have changed. The effort now is to
get the monument out of Forest Service and into National Park Service hands for
proper management. Scott Kruse, Fresno ----------------- Hi
Tom,
The
idea that a massive disturbance like a fire, chaining and burning, spraying,
etc. is going to return a site to original productivity for anything other than
a short term, in even an arid (not increasingly arid) environment, is the
opposite of what research around the world shows. Has anyone done an
honest check on the progress/status of the massive crested wheatgrass
plantations that were developed in Nevada's Basin and Range country since the
1960s? A follow-up investigation of what happens with post-treatment
plant communities from other 'management' disturbances in the Great Basin could
prove illuminating. What interesting times we are in. Regards, Ray
Butler, Truckee ------------------
Tom
-
When I first heard of this juniper cut it was two years ago and
at that time it was all about re-establish the grasses that had
been lost to over grazing. It seems the junipers were able to take over
after the cattle had grazed off all the other vegetation. Cattle don't
care for juniper. This is an example of a huge problem facing land
management in the west, poor grazing practices not only from the past but
still being practiced today. I
guess what I'm trying to say is without the poor grazing practices of the past
there would never of been a story of having to cut down juniper forests today. Steve
Robinson, Westwood
