Kings Blog and Q&A

News, observations and reader questions about the Sacramento Kings and the NBA.

August 29, 2007
The extension

On an ESPN radio interview Tuesday with J.J. Stokes (yes, that J.J. Stokes) and Mike "The Mouth" on a Modesto affiliate, Mike asked a good question: Is Kevin Martin being signed for $55 million based on the player he is, or the player Geoff Petrie expects him to be? The answer, in my opinion, leans more toward the future than the past.

The best case scenario in Petrie's head is five seasons of elite play, with Martin performing on par with the $15-million-per-year types but coming at a lesser cost. Martin's breakout 2006-07 season only confirmed what Petrie thought he could be in the NBA, a supremely-talented scorer with the body and athleticism to be even more. If he had any doubt that Martin's game would keep rising, the extension would have been put off and Petrie would have forced Martin to repeat his performance and his future would have waited until the free agency period next summer.

Petrie will speak Wednesday afternoon about why he chose to handle this business now, but I'm guessing it goes far beyond the financials. Signing Martin now gives the fanbase something of significance to be excited about, a centerpiece of sorts to enjoy even if the team has the rough season so many are expecting. That fact is even more true considering the lack of other offseason action. And just in case no one noticed the incessant advertising of season tickets on the team's web site, it should be noted to you fans that the organization is certainly concerned about interest.

Money-wise, I see it as a tough call for the team and a very smart move by Martin to sign now. If Martin waited until next summer, he could easily lose money by way of injury or a backslide in performance. And with a new coach and the uncertainty that comes with that environment, who knows how the season will go? Before this deal, Martin was only guaranteed $1.8 million. It's safe to say the 26th pick who hails from of Boonsville College, err, Western Carolina, has lifelong financial security now for himself a few generations to come back in his Zanesville, Ohio, hometown - where the median household income in 2000 was $26,642.

The Kings, meanwhile, paid mightily for their high opinion of Martin, budging in the neighborhood of $13 million from the start of negotiations to reach the $55 million mark. As is the case with any big deal, the pressure is on the player now that he's gone from a K-Mart bargain to earning a King's ransom.

-- Sam Amick

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


Kings Bloggers

Tag Cloud

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives