Kings Blog and Q&A

News, observations and reader questions about the Sacramento Kings and the NBA.

June 23, 2008
The Kings, the second round and the chance it'll mean something

Maybe the Kings, wanting to avoid the congestion of potentially developing three rookies while also investing minutes in the progress of second-year man Spencer Hawes, don't get an immediate return from both second-round picks as their disposal Thursday. Maybe they deal one for a future second rounder in a deferral often used by others, maybe they take someone who stays overseas in 2008-09, maybe they package No. 42 and 43 and trade into the end of the first round in a move that allows the other team to avoid a guaranteed contract.

(The other, extremely uneventful possibility for attrition by opening night: one or both of the selections get cut / get to know the end of the bench / get an expense-paid tour of the D-League. Second-rounders aren't generally the cause of troublesome congestion.)

But it's at least intriguing this time. The Kings haven't taken a turn in the second round since 2004 (Ricky Minard) and haven't gotten so much as a minimal return from the land of the non-guaranteed contract since 2000 (Jabari Smith). Added statistical twist: players who were not drafted at all (Brad Miller, Mikki Moore) have a far greater presence on the roster than anyone who's gone between 31 and 60.

It gets interesting if 42 and 43, and perhaps another spare part, trades the Kings into late in the first round. Then, the two years of guaranteed contract make the commitment to the selection tangible.

And, intriguing options should be available pretty high as the 12th (from the Hawks as part of the Mike Bibby deal) and 13th (their own) choices of the second round. Mock drafts turn a mix of educated guess and the expert analysis of eeny-meeny-miny-mo by then, so Grain Of Salt time. But five candidates who fit a Kings need or are just intriguing prospects worth a flyer and realistically could be available in the 40s:

  • Kyle Weaver, Washington State guard. One pick, two offseason needs potentially filled: Weaver is a defensive star, and the Kings just finished 24th in scoring defense and 22nd in shooting defense, and he could become a backup point guard for a roster particularly light at that position. He best fits as a combo guard.
  • Joey Dorsey, Memphis power forward. No offense and undersized at 6-7, but major energy and a mix of athleticism and strength that helps compensate for height. He rebounds and defends with a non-stop motor, an approach that would be particularly beneficial on a roster that too often would sleep walk through games. Dorsey turns 25 in December, unusually old for a draft pick. That would be an issue for someone tracking to the top half of the first round -- older equals a smaller window for a career, less chance for a pro team to shape a player, etc. The second round is different. Get any measurable contribution from there and it's a good return.
  • Luc Richard Mbah a Moute, UCLA small forward. The fall from potential first-round pick a couple years ago hasn't changed his status as a quick, long-armed, versatile defender. (There's that theme again.) The experience of big games deep in the NCAA tournament -- 10 rebounds in the 2006 title game as a freshman, 13 rebounds and 12 points in the '08 Final Four against Memphis -- doesn't hurt the resume, either.
  • Trent Plaisted, BYU power forward / center. Ron Artest provides the only consistent post play on offense now, pending the return of Shareef Abdur-Rahim from a knee injury that cost him 74 games. Plaisted has good mobility and scores inside. Not a physical presence, though.
  • Goran Dragic, Slovenian point guard. The potential overseas card. But also good size (6-4) and speed at a position the Kings need help.
No stars of the moment. The realistic goal in the second round is to find someone who will fill a niche need rather than anyone who can dominate, with those real finds a rarity (Gilbert Arenas, Carlos Boozer). It's no different for the Kings, even if the level of their participation at this stage is.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


Kings Bloggers

Tag Cloud

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives