Kings Blog and Q&A

News, observations and reader questions about the Sacramento Kings and the NBA.

January 16, 2009
Opening tip: Francisco Garcia, the starting lineup and the possibilities

Bucks (19-22) at Kings (10-30)

Scoring: Kings 14th (98), Bucks 19th (97.4).
Shooting: Kings 24th (44.4 percent), Bucks 20th (44.7).
Scoring defense: Kings 28th (106.8), Bucks 13th (96.9).
Shooting defense: Kings 27th (47.4 percent), Bucks tied for 13th (45.2).
Rebound differential: Kings 27th (minus-3.4), Bucks fifth (plus-3).

The link: Bucks coverage in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
The almanac: On this date in 1962, Wilt Chamberlain of the Philadelphia Warriors scored 42 points, the most ever in an All-Star game, and grabbed 24 rebounds en route to MVP honors even though his East team lost 150-130. The West's Bob Pettit had an All-Star record 27 rebounds. On this date in 1966, Chicago was granted a franchise, to be called the Bulls. On this date in 1993, Michael Jordan of the Bulls scored 64 points in an overtime loss to the Magic.

__________


Forty-two minutes Wednesday was an aberration. Kenny Natt squeezed the rotation, triple overtime on the second night of a back-to-back or not, and 42 minutes was fifth-most among the Kings in the Oakland endurance test.


Francisco Garcia's eight previous games: 27, 27, 24, 24, 21, 21, 24 and 23 minutes. An average of 23.9 per. Toss out the rarity of the 3 OT late late show the other night and he hasn't broken 30 since Dec. 26.

Plus, his possible move into the starting lineup just turned fuzzy again. Natt hearts Beno Udrih again and for now apparently trusts Udrih enough to close tight games, which didn't happen for the longest time. Natt doesn't love Garcia at point guard, but likes the defense he couldn't get from Udrih or Bobby Brown and obviously liked anybody but Beno in a fourth quarter or overtime, and imagine the possibilities if the Kings had gone ahead and moved Cisco into the opening lineup:

PG -- Garcia, at 6-7.
SG -- Kevin Martin, at 6-7.
SF -- Jason Thompson, at 6-11.
PF -- Spencer Hawes, at 7-0.
C -- Brad Miller, at 7-0.

Going big is intriguing. It gets Hawes and Thompson in the lineup together, which is important, it creates some mismatches while only slightly weakening the Kings defensively, at small forward. Thompson would be playing a bit out of position and couldn't handle any of the quick 3s, except that it's not like he's a stopper at power forward. And Garcia for Udrih is an upgrade on D.

The real problem is the demotion for John Salmons, and this is not the season for that. The alternative, then:

PG -- Garcia.
SG -- Martin.
SF -- Salmons.
PF -- Hawes.
C -- Miller.

Really radical is going small, strange as that sounds with two 6-7 guys in the backcourt, but Miller and four wings, along the lines of that endless stretch drive against the Warriors, would be the same attempt at creating mismatches, or at creating something. Anything. Udrih, Garcia, Martin, Salmons and Miller.

That's the fluky lineup and more spit balling than anything because you can't play everyone the same way you play Golden State, the definition of fluky lineups. Small lineups need to be fleet and often trapping to compensate for the size deficiency and avoid getting crushed on defense, and Udrih-Garcia-Martin-Salmons-Miller does not confuse for fleet.

This all comes from someone who has long believed Garcia is an ideal sixth man - the energy boost off the bench, the versatility to be plugged into three positions depending on the need of the night. A long career as a sixth man is a valued role.

There has to be some way, though, to scrounge more than 23.9 minutes a game over two weeks for the player who delivers exactly what you're lacking. Defense, energy, leadership. That's Garcia.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


Kings Bloggers

Tag Cloud

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives