Kings Blog and Q&A

News, observations and reader questions about the Sacramento Kings and the NBA.

January 29, 2009
Overtime: The looming uncertainty is certainly interesting

BOSTON 119, KINGS 100

Game story, Game notes

Box score, Video recap

***

BOSTON - Since it was hardly even worth recapping the game in today's story in which Brad Miller and John Salmons spoke candidly about being on the trading block, we may as well keep the theme going the morning after.

Because this team, in its current state, is obviously going nowhere.

While Salmons remains the most available King with the most value, Jim Reeves of the Fort Worth Star Telegram beat me to the punch in addressing the possibility that Beno Udrih could be on his way out too. Yesterday was the first day in which I'd heard of Dallas' interest in the Kings point guard, and it should surprise no one that they are willing to part ways with him at this point for the right package.

For as much as they hoped he would blossom after they gave him a five-year, $32 million deal over the summer, the supposed saving grace was that point guards are considered more easily movable than most. Now at that price tag and given the way he has played this season, I'm not so sure about that at the moment.

Potential pieces that could come the Kings' way here would be point guard Jose Barea (this year and next, $3.1 combined guaranteed with team option at $1.8 million for 2010-11) and perhaps Brandon Bass ($826K, expiring deal). Of course neither makes enough to get up to Udrih money, so - as has been the case since the Mavericks tried to get Ron Artest over the summer - Jerry Stackhouse and his deal ($7 million this year, $7.2 next) have likely been in the talks.

THE RELEVANCE OF REEF

While I had a long-awaited update on the financial situation that surrounds retired forward/Kings assistant Shareef Abdur-Rahim on Wednesday, I didn't have a chance to break down the relevance beyond what was in the story (read it first if you haven't for proper context).

* Cash is King for the Kings. Everyone is hurting in this economy, and I continue to be astounded at how many cost-cutting measures I've been hearing about that are Kings-related. That being said, $6.2 million off the salary cap (and covered by insurance) is something the Maloofs like.

* Now for the part fans actually care about. If the league grants the Kings' wishes and gives takes Abdur-Rahim's $6.2 million off their cap this year, it gets them a little further away from the luxury tax and could provide some much-necessary wiggle room if they had a trade in mind in which they would have to take back a bit more than they give away.

* This blog session will be cut short at this time, as my flight from Boston (yes, I made it here, but just barely) is leaving. - Sam Amick

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


Kings Bloggers

Tag Cloud

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives