The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

April 15, 2009
UPDATE: CASE wins SCIF furlough lawsuit

A San Francisco Superior Court judge has ruled that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger shouldn't have furloughed state employees working for the State Compensation Insurance Fund.

The unexpected ruling from the bench by Judge Peter Busch came this morning after about 90 minutes of debate by attorneys for the Schwarzenegger administration and other representing California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges and Hearing Officers in State Employment and three SCIF employees.

The lawsuit named Schwarzenegger, DPA Director Dave Gilb, Controller John Chiang and SCIF President Jan Frank. Attorneys for CASE and the employees successfully argued that since SCIF is financially and administratively independent, the furlough order shouldn't have included its 8,000 employees.

Frank submitted a brief that sided with the plaintiffs. In this e-mail to SCIF staff following the decision, Frank said, "This ruling raises a number of questions and we ask for your patience as we sort through the issues."

Department of Personnel spokeswoman Lynelle Jolley said the administration had no comment other than it would review the judge's decision.

UPDATE @ 2:40 p.m. SCIF spokeswoman Jennifer Vargen said that the implications of the ruling still need to be hammered out.

"The issue is extremely complex. At this point we don't know if there's going to be an appeal. There's a pending labor agreement.with SEIU. There are a lot of things to be worked out."

Patrick Whalen, one of the attorneys that represented SCIF legal staff, pointed out that the ruling only directly impacts the 500 state workers at SCIF who are in Bargaining Unit 2.

"The case has logical implications that apply to all SCIF employees," he said. "If I was a secretary and learned that my attorney wasn't going to have furloughs, I'd be asking, 'What about me?'"

Whalen said that the petition wasn't aimed at covering all SCIF employees, but it rests on Insurance Code provisions that apply to SCIF as a whole.

There's also some question whether the judge's final decision will be formally rendered in time for the Controller's Office to adjust its payroll apparatus for April, Whalen said. He thought the deadline is April 19.

We have a call in to the Controller to find out.

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.



About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

Now on the State Worker column

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Categories


October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives