The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

January 18, 2010
Bill aims to keep governor from withholding pay

We mentioned during our Friday appearance on News10's Live_Online that a bill now in the Legislature would keep governors from temporarily withholding state worker pay to in the event of a budget impasse. You'll recall that Schwarzenegger ordered employee pay cut to the federal minimum in the summer of 2008 when budget talks locked up. Controller John Chiang refused to follow pay letter instructions from the Department of Personnel Administration ordering the payroll change, however.

The matter wound up in Sacramento Superior Court, where Judge Timothy Frawley ruled that Chiang overstepped his authority. Click here for a quick refresher on that case, now on appeal in Sacramento's 3rd District Court.

Here's the Legislative Counsel's explanation of AB 1125:

This bill would continuously appropriate from the General Fund and other specified funds to the Controller an amount necessary for the payment of compensation and employee benefits to state employees, as defined, for work performed on or after July 1 of a fiscal year for which no budget has been enacted.

This bill would specify, if a memorandum of understanding is in effect that has been approved by the Legislature, that the compensation and contribution for employee benefits for represented state employees be at a rate consistent with the memorandum of understanding and, for state employees excluded from collective bargaining, at the rate approved by the Department of Personnel Administration prior to the commencement of the fiscal year for which a Budget Act has not been enacted.

The bill would require, if a memorandum of understanding is not in effect for represented state employees and the department has not approved a compensation package for state employees excluded from collective bargaining, that the compensation and contribution for employee benefits for represented state employees and state employees excluded from collective bargaining be at the rate in effect at the expiration of the last fiscal year for which a budget was enacted.

The bill, which you can read by clicking this link, has to pass the Assembly by Jan. 31, highly unlikely since the urgency measure needs a two-thirds vote. But we wanted to call it to your attention, since it came up in our discussion with News10's Sharon Ito and we mistakenly cited AB 1215 (which is another bill of interest to state employees that you can read about by clicking here).

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.



About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Categories


October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives