The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

August 16, 2010
Unions respond to Schwarzenegger's request for Supreme Court review

100609 gavel.jpgAttorneys for eight state employee organizations have filed a response to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's request that the state Supreme Court allow him to furlough state workers while it reviews an appellate court decision that kept him from restarting the policy last Friday.

The employee groups' answer, a 26-page letter hand-delivered to the court's San Francisco offices, argues a review isn't warranted.

Schwarzenegger's attorneys last week asked the First District Court of Appeal for permission to restart furloughs, despite a trial court decision that stopped the policy pending a full hearing on Sept. 13. The appellate court denied the request.

The governor took up the matter with the state Supreme Court last week, calling the policy "one of the aggressive cash management measures" needed to "preserve vital cash assets." The appellate court got it wrong, his lawyers contended, and they also attacked the trial court's ruling:

100813 Schwarzenegger.JPG

Click here and here for the documents filed by the governor's attorneys.

The employee groups, which are parties in nine furlough lawsuits that have been consolidated for that September hearing in Alameda Superior Court, fired back today. They argued that the governor's review request doesn't raise any new issues that merit consideration and that the appellate court correctly decided against Schwarzenegger.
Click here for that document.

The employee associations and unions involved in the litigation include Professional Engineers in California Government; California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges and Hearing Officers in State Employment; SEIU Local 1000; the Association of California State Supervisors; the California Correctional Supervisors Organization; the California Statewide Law Enforcement Association; the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 39 and the California Correctional Peace Officers' Association.

If the high court agrees with the governor, more than 144,000 state workers would be back on Furlough Fridays, possibly this week. Otherwise, furloughs are on ice until at least next month when more court action is scheduled. A new budget deal between now and then also could affect state employees' work schedules.

Everyone we've spoken with today expects the court to rule soon. Stay tuned.

IMAGE: www.yolocourts.ca.gov

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.



About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Categories


October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives