The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

Thursday's news rush (the new SEIU labor deal, the governor's latest executive order, the 800-page budget bill , an avalanche of e-mails and phone calls and our responsibility to blog and write this story for today's Bee) has given way to a slightly less frenetic "Furlough Friday" (so far at least).

So let's take a few minutes to tackle some of the most common questions sent our way about the budget bill and the SEIU contract:

What does the budget bill mean for state workers in unions without a contract?

The budget language we referenced in this post includes these key paragraphs (we've underlined the vital wording) that lay out how employee compensation is going to be cut:

SEC. 3.91. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this act, each item of appropriation in this act, with the exception of those items for the California State University, the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, the Legislature, and the judicial branch, shall be reduced, as appropriate, to reflect reductions in employee compensation achieved through the collective bargaining process or through administrative actions for represented employees and a proportionate reduction for nonrepresented employees (utilizing existing authority of the administration to adjust compensation for nonrepresented employees) in the total amounts of $896,000,000 from General Fund items and $661,000,000 from items relating to other funds ...

(e) Appropriation reductions implemented pursuant to this section may be those related to collective bargaining agreements or other administrative actions put into effect either prior to or subsequent to the enactment of this act.

So what are "administrative actions"? As we understand it from Senate floor discussion of the measure on Thursday and from background discussions we've had with union officials, that language deputizes the governor to furlough state workers in bargaining units without a current labor contract.

Although AB 1630 in the Assembly and its Senate twin, SB 870, don't use the word "furlough," the language is broad enough to allow them. Click here for the Thursday State Worker column that dealt with the Legislature's struggle to address furloughs in the budget bill in light of Monday's California Supreme Court ruling.

I'm a manager. What about non-union employees like me?

The budget bill also says that the governor can use "existing authority" to order comp cuts for managers and supervisors. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger didn't wait for the budget to pass, however. Last night he ordered compensation cuts and pension contribution hikes for 35,000 exempt employees. Click here for more about Executive Order S-15-10.

Regarding the voluntary paid leave program -- will the furloughs be retroactive, or will they simply count 12 months from October?

The Personal Leave Program that mandates one unpaid day off per month will start when the contract is ratified. Affected employees won't have to cram in 12 unpaid days off by the June 30, 2011 end of the current fiscal year. If you start PLP in December, your last PLP month will be November 2011.

The agreement guarantees no furloughs during the 12-month PLP period, but not after that.

It is unclear how the furloughs executed from August to October will be handled -- do they count for nine of the 12 required, or it is actually 21 furlough days required?

The SEIU agreement adds the PLP days on top of the nine furlough days that started in August and run through this month, so the deal anticipates a total 21 unpaid days off.

How much of the state's leadership/budget problem is again being foisted on state workers?

If you're asking how much the SEIU contract cuts state employee costs, the administration says it's $383 million for the current fiscal year. Roughly half of that is savings to the General Fund.

Will the 3 percent top step raise kick in when the new contract is ratified?

No. It kicks in July 1, 2013.

What is up with CCPOA? Are they just no longer bargaining?

CCPOA met informally with the administration over the summer. The union sent in a new team in an effort to move past the rocky bargaining history that led to impasse and imposed terms for its members. Schwarzenegger tapped Dave Gilb, the respected former DPA director to represent the administration.

The discussion went nowhere and nothing has happened since then. This post has more details.

Can you post a copy of the tentative agreement? I want to read it for myself.

DPA has posted the TAs for all nine bargaining units represented by Local 1000. Each post contains a summary of provisions and the tentative agreement itself. Warning: The TA files are large and may exceed the download limits of some servers.

Do you know if a 5 percent across the board cut in pay is also included in the agreement? I know that it was discussed but I can't find it actually listed as one of the concessions.

Many people have confused the governor's January order for a 5 percent "workforce cap" which mandated a reduction in departments' personnel costs, with a 5 percent individual pay cut. Click here for a blog post that clears up the confusion.

This gives us a chance to explain the rough math that gets the SEIU deal to the 15 percent cut in employee costs the governor has insisted on since his first budget proposal in January.

The nine furlough days, combined with increased employee pension contributions and the 12 unpaid leave days, translates to a 10 percent payroll savings. Kick in the 5 percent personnel cost reduction mentioned above, the the administration says the state gets an immediate 15 percent payroll savings from this deal.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz started The State Worker blog and column in 2008 as a member of The Bee's business staff, where he covered workplace and labor issues. He moved to the Capitol Bureau in January 2009 to cover state employment issues full time. Join him for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

Recommended Links

Categories


July 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Monthly Archives