The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

July 12, 2011
Millions spent on contractors for 'unnecessary' mental health screenings

A lack of coordination between the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Department of Mental Health resulted in the state paying tens of millions of dollars to contractors for "unnecessary work," according to a state audit released today.

The state created the Sex Offender Commitment Program in 1996 to ensure proper care for the small population of sex offenders predisposed to violent behavior because of mental disorders. Corrections officials refer offenders to the mental health department for evaluation, which then recommends to the courts whether or not someone needs to be part of the program.

After Jessica's Law (Proposition 83 in 2006) expanded the pool of potential violent sex offenders nearly five-fold, the Corrections department failed to follow state law and basically referred everyone to the mental health department for evaluation.

During the past four years, less than one percent of the 30,000 sex offenders referred to the Mental Health department by corrections officials were tagged as needing commitment.

Thousands of the people sent over were repeated offenders, whom the mental health department had already said did not pose a high risk to public safety because of a mental disorder.

The mental health department struggled in hiring qualified evaluators willing to work for low pay or training existing employees to handle screenings, which meant about $3,300 was spent per evaluation to hire a contractor to do it. About five dozen contractors were needed each year.

Between fiscal years 2005-06 and 2009-10, the hiring of contractors for the increased load of evaluations cost $49 million, according to a report cited in the audit. The contractors' tab ran $124 per hour, according to a March 2010 analysis done by the department, compared to $72 per hour--including benefits--for state psychologists.

"We agree that improvements can be made in streamlining the process and have already implemented steps to improve the timeliness of our referrals to DMH," wrote Scott Kernan, the Corrections department's undersecretary for operations, in a letter to state auditor Elaine Howle. "We look forward to carefully reviewing the recommendations in this report and will continue our work with DMH to increase efficiency."

The state law that allows the mental health department to contract for various evaluations expires Jan. 1, 2012. The State Personnel Board will consider next month a request from the department to open a new employee classification. The department's plan would be to hire 10 new psychologists next year and then add 10 more each year until it no longer needs contractors. The board has previously favored dropping the use the of contractors by the department.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives