The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

January 18, 2012
One public pension initiative dies; more face looming deadlines

The herd of public pay and pension reform ballot measures is thinning out.

One pension fund reform measure is dead and several others will soon miss their petition deadlines.

Meanwhile, two plans backed by California Pension Reform are just a few days into the 150-day period to gather and submit signatures. The Sacramento-based group hasn't yet announced which measure it will promote. It has until mid-June to qualify a proposal for the November ballot.

We've called and left messages with the proponents of measures that are approaching their deadlines. If they call back with news, we'll report it here.

Here's a scorecard with links to measures facing deadlines this month or next:

Dead

Title: Requires minimum investment by public pension or retirement systems in California businesses.
What it does: Requires all state and local public pension funds to invest 85 percent of their assets in California businesses.
Circulation deadline: Jan. 12 (expired)
Proponent: Michael Lee Madsen Sr.

Approaching deadline

Title: Eliminates Collective Bargaining Rights for Teachers, Nurses, Police Officers, Firefighters, and Other Public Employees.
What it does: Eliminates collective bargaining rights for public employees.
Circulation deadline: Feb. 3.
Proponent: Alan Oliver Ebenstein c/o Lanny Ebenstein

Title: Increases Income Taxes on Teachers, Nurses, Police Officers, Firefighters, and Other Public Employees for Pension Income.
What it does: Increases the income tax rate by up to 25 percent on public pensions over $100,000.
Circulation deadline: Feb. 3.
Proponent: Alan Oliver Ebenstein c/o Lanny Ebenstein

Title: Increases Retirement Age for Teachers, Peace Officers, and Other Public Employees.
What it does: Increases the minimum retirement age to 65 (or 58 for sworn public safety officers) for members of the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the California State Teachers' Retirement System
Circulation deadline: Feb. 3.
Proponent: Alan Oliver Ebenstein c/o Lanny Ebenstein

Title: Reduces Pension Benefits for Public Employees. Creates a New State Retirement System for Private Sector Employees.
What it does: Reduces pension benefits for current and future public employees and creates a new state-run retirement system for private-sector workers.
Proponent: Edward J. (Ted) Costa, Robert J. Matteoli
Circulation deadline: Feb. 10.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives