The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

January 4, 2012
CCPOA settles former employee's discrimination lawsuit

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for 100602 yolo county gavel.jpgThe California Correctional Peace Officers Association has settled a discrimination and unfair treatment lawsuit brought by a former longtime employee whose husband had been a 2008 candidate for the union's presidency.

The terms of the settlement are confidential.

CCPOA spokesman JeVaughn Baker said that the union "rejects all of the allegations," but made a "pragmatic business decision" to settle.

"At some point you have to count the beans," Baker said this morning. "This is a low-level employment issue, an internal issue."

A call to former employee Sharon Rafferty's attorney, James E. McGlamery, wasn't immediately returned.

Communications liaison Rafferty had worked for CCPOA for nearly 25 years before she was terminated and sued the union in 2009.

She alleged that after her husband, Dan Rafferty, announced in 2008 he was running "against a candidate that was favored by Management of the CCPOA," that she "was subjected to unwarranted, unfair, discriminatory treatment by Management of CCPOA," according to her November 2009 complaint. Mike Jimenez, CCPOA's current president, won reelection to his second three-year term in September 2008.

Rafferty went out on stress leave, and the union eventually terminated her position. She filed complaints with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. When those weren't successful, Rafferty sued in Sacramento civil court for lost earnings and damages.

She accused CCPOA of seven violations that included breach of contract and various forms of employer discrimination.

In January 2010, CCPOA offered a 12-point defense to Rafferty's complaint.

Last August, Sacramento Superior Court Judge David Brown summarily ruled against all but one complaint, that CCPOA had retaliated against Rafferty. Click here to download Brown's order.

Jury selection on the surviving complaint started Tuesday morning. Here's what happened next, according to the court's account:

After the noon recess, the Court and counsel had settlement discussions.

After discussions with the Court, counsel indicated the matter has settled.

Counsel stated the settlement into the record. The Court indicated this agreement is with a confidentiality clause. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter up to 18 months as stated into the record.

Court adjourned at 3:30 p.m.


On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.

About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at


Now on the State Worker column

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.


October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Monthly Archives