The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

October 17, 2012
Arizona group gives $11 million to pass Prop. 32, defeat Prop. 30

As reported on our sister blog, Capitol Alert, a committee supporting Proposition 32 and opposing Gov. Jerry Brown's tax increase on the Nov. 6 ballot has received $11 million from an out-of-state group.

Phoenix-based Americans for Responsible Leadership gave the money to Small Business Action Committee PAC, which is backing Proposition 32 and opposing Proposition 30. The group was formed as a non-profit in Arizona and has not reported its donors there or here.

It's also not clear how the money will be spent, because the business committee can spend the money to support Proposition 32 or oppose Proposition 30. Donations to the PAC now total $29.2 million, according to state records.

Another independent expenditure committee, California Future Fund, has received and spent $4 million. The group has reported ties to the Koch brothers. The money has gone to pro-Proposition 32 advertising.

The Yes on 32 campaign has raised roughly $3.5 million, according to state records, nearly all of it from individuals with business ties who contributed $10,000 or more.

Contributors to committees focused on defeating Proposition 32, mostly organized labor, have given more than $51 million.

Proposition 32's opponents in labor say the measure's provision to ban payroll-deducted money for political use is aimed directly at hobbling them. While the measure explicitly applies the ban to both unions and corporations, the provision wouldn't impact business much at all, since they raise political spending money via individual contributions. Unions raise their money exclusively via payroll-deducted member dues.

The measure also bans unions and corporations from contributing directly to candidates, but since the courts have ruled that organizations and individuals can spend unlimited sums on independent expenditure campaigns, corporations would still have money to channel in that direction. Unions wouldn't.

Supporters say the measure goes as far as the law allows to limit the money that influences politics.

Click here for a more detailed explanation of Proposition 32. This link will open the Secretary of State's webpage with a list of committees for and against the measure and links to their financial reports. Here's the filing that details the Americans for Responsible Leadership contribution:
Small Business Action Committee PAC 10/16/2012

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives