The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

November 19, 2012
Jerry Brown administration files furlough appeal

100602 yolo county gavel.jpgA $12-million furlough lawsuit has entered its next phase with a formal appeal filed by Gov. Jerry Brown that seeks to overturn a lower court ruling against the administration.

The case, PECG v. Brown, affects some 13,000 state engineers and state scientists whose unions say were excessively furloughed two days last year. The matter also touches on about 250 members who the union says shouldn't have been furloughed a single day when the controversial policy launched in February 2009.

UPDATE: 13,000 California state workers win back pay in furlough lawsuit

An Alameda Superior Court judge last summer ruled that all PECG and CAPS members should receive two days of back pay as a remedy for two illegal furlough days imposed on them in March 2011. The court agreed with the unions' argument that since management didn't have to take those days off that their members shouldn't have either.

Judge Steven A. Brick also concluded that furloughing 255 scientists and engineers at the Department of Toxic Substance Control and the State Water Control Resources Board violated state law. Those workers handle hazardous substance management and remediation at military bases.

The case applies only to employees covered by Professional Engineers in California Government or California Association of Professional Scientists.

The brief filed by Brown administration contract attorney David Tyra last week says that the unions and the lower court got it all wrong.

Nothing in the laws cited in the Brick ruling limits the state's authority over employee compensation, as the unions had argued, nor did the furlough order overstep its legal scope, Tyra contends. And the trial court relied on "incompetent evidence" when it concluded that managers and union members had to lose the same number of hours and pay.

Click here to download the 53-page brief or read the embedded copy below. The unions will soon file their response, then the administration will file its rebuttal. All the briefing should be done by late January or early February.

Look for a court date to be set sometime next year, unless the two sides settle.

121119 PECG v Brown

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives