The Swarm

Mix it up with The Bee's editorial board.

October 20, 2008
Are newspaper endorsements "dinosaurs"? Or a heritage worth keeping?
CC_DINOSAUR_WIDE.JPGThe Swarm last week blogged on how congressional candidate Tom McClintock was balking at meeting with The Bee's editorial board for an endorsement interview. The item drew a number of comments, including this one from "csicathy," who wrote:

Newspaper "endorsements" are so irrelevant today, so predictible, so utterly lacking in credibility, why would McClintock waste his time? Time to pull the plug on this dinosaur called "editorial board."
As it turned out, after we published our blog item, McClintock's campaign quickly arranged an interview with our editorial board dinosaur. That made us feel more relevant. Even so, csicathy's item touched a nerve. At a time when newspapers are struggling and voters have so many options for information on candidates, do newspaper editorials really matter?


Some media watchers say "yes," depending on the contest and the location of the newspaper. In a column in Editor & Publisher, Greg Mitchell suggests that newspaper endorsements in Ohio might have helped George Bush in 2004 edge out a narrow victory there, which returned Bush to the White House.

Others are more skeptical. In a column in American Journalism Review in 2004, Tim Porter, a former assistant managing editor for the San Francisco Examiner, concluded there's scant evidence that newspaper editorials influence many votes (outside of local races) and that many papers endorse for president out of vanity, or merely to stir debate.

In the current campaign, Obama has a huge margin in newspaper endorsements, 112-39, as of Monday. Does it matter? Perhaps. The Chicago Tribune endorsed him Sunday, the first time it has endorsed a Democrat for president. At the L.A. Times opinion pages, editor Jim Newton writes that he's been flooded with comments since the Times endorsed Obama on Sunday.

Over at the Knoxville News Sentinel, in Tennessee, the opinion pages recently asked readers if the paper should endorse in the presidential race. Responses were mixed. Many said no. And some questioned if the paper could make an informed choice without direct access to the candidates.

But one reader, bless his heart, had this to say:

Opinion is what the editorial page is for. If the (Knoxville) editorial board has an opinion on the election, please share it with your readers. I don't think that lack of direct access to the candidates is a valid argument. For goodness sakes, you surely know enough about the differences between Obama and McCain to have a preference. As for charges of bias, you're going to get that no matter what you do. So take advantage of your first amendment rights and take a stand, whatever it is.

So where do you stand? Should newspapers take a stand in presidential contests? Should they endorse in any races? And if not, why?

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.



About The Swarm

The Swarm is written by members of The Sacramento Bee's editorial board. They meet daily and are separate from the newsroom. Views included here are those of individual writers, and do not necessarily reflect those of a majority of the board or the positions expressed in The Bee's editorials.

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Stuart Leavenworth on Twitter

Follow "SacBeeEditBoard" on Twitter