The Swarm

Mix it up with The Bee's editorial board.

November 6, 2008
Inside the Republican legislative mind

The Legislature's Republican leaders, as expected, have condemned the governor's call for a combination of tax increases and spending cuts to bring the state's budget back into balance. I understand their ideological position in favor of smaller government and more individual, rather than collective, action. In fact I share it. But I have never understood the refusal of virtually every California Republican legislator to ever even consider raising taxes. It seems to me like a position of weakness that allows one's decisions to be dictated by the actions of long-dead legislators who established today's mix of tax types and tax rates.

Essentially, the Republicans were arguing 6 weeks ago, when they threatened to override a possible Schwarzenegger veto of the budget, that $102 billion was the ideal level of spending for California, because $102 billion happened to be the projected total of revenue coming to the state this year. But now that the revenue projection has droppped to $91 billion due to the recession and the collapse of the stock and housing markets, is $91 billion also suddenly now the ideal level of spending? This is auto-pilot thinking: whatever the tax system provides, that's the level of spending we need. It seems so passive to me.

A more prudent approach would be to evaluate California's needs, put a price tag on them, and then figure out a way to finance those needs with the mix of taxes that does the least damage to economic growth. And if you think that higher taxes damage the economy, you should then weigh that damage against the possible damage done by cuts to schools or health care, law enforcement and infrastructure. Isn't it at least theoretically possible that the damage done by cutting spending would be worse than the damage done by raising taxes, even temporarily? Wouldn't you want to know before casting your vote?

Finally, the no-new taxes-ever mindset prevents the Republicans from ever being able to negotiate with the Democrats for long-term reforms. As long as the Republican refuse to consider even temporary revenue increases, there is no incentive for the Democrats to vote for spending cuts. They have done it from time to time, but they would certainly be open to more reductions, and more structural change, if Republicans came to the table with something to offer in exchange. If I were a Republican legisaltor, I think I would consider a long term deal that lowered the spending trajectory in exchange for higher revenues, especially if it held the possiblity of finally stabilizing the state's volatile finances. I would tend to think that the constant state of crisis in Sacramento was not the best thing for economic growth. A business owner thinking of coming to California or expanding here can't be too impressed by the leadership he or she sees in the Capitol.

About Comments

Reader comments on are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.

About The Swarm

The Swarm is written by members of The Sacramento Bee's editorial board. They meet daily and are separate from the newsroom. Views included here are those of individual writers, and do not necessarily reflect those of a majority of the board or the positions expressed in The Bee's editorials.

October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Stuart Leavenworth on Twitter

Follow "SacBeeEditBoard" on Twitter