The Swarm

Mix it up with The Bee's editorial board.

June 8, 2010
Pro-cityhood group apologizes, foes seek investigation

The broader questions about the proposed incorporation of Arden Arcade aside, the two sides are going at it hammer and tong over how the pro-cityhood group is going about its business -- and what that might mean for a new city.

After more than four years, cityhood supporters are on the cusp of getting incorporation on the Nov. 2 ballot. With the blessing of the Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission, only a typically pro-forma vote from county supervisors stands in the way.

Stay Sacramento, the main group opposing incorporation, has been pressing for the Arden Arcade Incorporation Committee to disclose its financial backers. And now that it has, Stay Sacramento called today for the Sacramento District Attorney and California Attorney General to launch an "immediate and complete investigation" into two of the newly revealed contributions: $20,000 from the Fulton-El Camino Recreation and Park District and $10,000 from the Arden Manor Recreation and Park District.

"This is a gross misuse of our taxpayer dollars," Mike Duveneck, chairman of Stay Sacramento, said in a statement. "It is absolutely deplorable that the community park districts would give funds intended for maintaining our neighborhood parks and providing athletic programs for children, families and seniors to a political organization attempting to form a city."

Noting that donations also came from several waste disposal companies, Duveneck added, "This cityhood drive is not about better government, it is about buying political favors as indicated by the total lack of transparency this group has been operating under."

On Monday, The Bee reported that the incorporation committee and the Arden Arcade Cityhood Study Team, an affiliated nonprofit group, have failed to register with the state attorney general's office and have failed to file all their federal tax returns.

The incorporation committee's chairman, Joel Archer, just issued a statement to The Bee this afternoon that apologized for what it described as "technical mistakes" committed by volunteers who are ordinary people, and that pledged to comply with the applicable laws.

"The supporters of cityhood would like to apologize for our lack of technical knowledge regarding every aspect of the monumental project we have undertaken. If this seems amateurish, it should. Volunteers running the group do appear to have made some technical mistakes, which are being corrected. These weren't professional bureaucrats or politicians, they were stay-at-home dads, small business people, retired workers and community volunteers who refused to accept the ongoing failure of the county trying to find a solution while county politicians, political operatives and bureaucrats tried to silence and divert them. As citizens committees, these entities have had volunteer members, without pay, throughout their existence," the statement said.

"We regret not understanding every form or fee required to maintain absolute compliance. This is a simple mistake made by ordinary people, unused to the inundation of paperwork involved in the most expensive incorporation process in California's history. The Incorporation Committee is, in fact, not tax exempt, while the Study Team was an IRS 501 (c)(3). Neither group was formed as a charity, but we will be verifying with the AG's office as to our exact requirements and submitting our $25 fee and registration as required. We have also been correcting the IRS Form 990s because they were done incorrectly by folks who had never previously seen such forms. It is an untruth that cityhood supporters have sought to deceive anyone or willfully ignored our legal obligations."

Return Wednesday to to find out what The Bee's editorial board thinks about the controversy.

About Comments

Reader comments on are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.

About The Swarm

The Swarm is written by members of The Sacramento Bee's editorial board. They meet daily and are separate from the newsroom. Views included here are those of individual writers, and do not necessarily reflect those of a majority of the board or the positions expressed in The Bee's editorials.

October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Stuart Leavenworth on Twitter

Follow "SacBeeEditBoard" on Twitter