The Swarm

Mix it up with The Bee's editorial board.

October 25, 2011
Dan Lungren crosses party lines and National Rifle Association

20110928_PK_COPSGRANT 0178.JPGRep. Dan Lungren split from fellow Republicans and the National Rifle Association today, voting against legislation that seeks to require California to honor concealed weapons permits issued by other states.

The Republican-controlled House Judiciary Committee approved the measure 19-11 on a near-party line vote. Lungren was the only Republican member who sided with Democrats by opposing the bill.

"I believe in the Second Amendment. I also believe in the 10th Amendment," Lungren told me after the vote. "I just don't think it struck the proper balance."

The so-called "National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2011" was the focus of this column, and this editorial.

Florida Republican Cliff Stearns is carrying the legislation, which would require that states grant reciprocity by recognizing concealed carry permits issued by other states.

The House likely will approve the bill when it comes up for a floor vote, probably in November. It has 240 co-sponsors, which is more than sufficient for approval. The legislation faces an uncertain fate the Senate where Democrats are in control.

In addition to crossing gun rights advocates, Lungren's vote ran counter to 14 California Republican House members, who have signed on as co-sponsors, including Rep. Tom McClintock of Elk Grove, Rep. Wally Herger of the Chico area, and Rep. Jeff Denham of Atwater. Two California Democrats including Rep. Dennis Cardoza of Merced also are co-sponsors.

Lungren, the former California attorney general, was siding with the California Police Chiefs Assn., which has called the bill "dangerous," and the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, which has led the lobbying effort against the bill.

Lungren made no comment as he voted. "I wasn't trying to be in anybody's face," Lungren said. But he also said: "Everybody knew how I voted." Several other committee members ducked the vote, including five Democrats and two Republicans.

Lungren will be running for reelection in 2012 in a reconfigured district in suburban Sacramento that includes Elk Grove, Fair Oaks, Orangevale and Folsom.

The district is seen as a seat that Democrats could win. But while pro-gun advocates might shun him, their alternative would be the likely Democratic challenger, Ami Bera, a physician who ran unsuccessfully for the seat last year.

In the interview, Lungren pointed to his pro-gun credentials, including signing on in support of the brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in the case in which justices concluded that there is an individual right, albeit limited, to own firearms.

He also said he believes California's gun law may be overly restrictive by authorizing local police to deny concealed weapons permits too readily.

"That is part of the reality of dealing with what some people call federation and others call states' rights," Lungren said. "We have the right to make that decision."

Photo by Paul Kitagaki of The Sacramento Bee, showing Lungren and others congratulating Congresswoman Doris Matsui, right, during a Sept. 29 announcement of 2011 COPS program awards of Community Oriented Policing Services in Sacramento.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.



About The Swarm

The Swarm is written by members of The Sacramento Bee's editorial board. They meet daily and are separate from the newsroom. Views included here are those of individual writers, and do not necessarily reflect those of a majority of the board or the positions expressed in The Bee's editorials.

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Stuart Leavenworth on Twitter

Follow "SacBeeEditBoard" on Twitter