The Swarm

Mix it up with The Bee's editorial board.

August 1, 2012
Sacramento council poised to hike fines for false alarms
It's probably logical, even justifiable for the city of Sacramento to charge higher fees for false alarms.

But there's still the nagging sense that this is more nickel-and-diming of residents.

The City Council is scheduled to vote tonight on higher fines for false fire alarms. If it goes along, homes and businesses would continue to get a free pass on the first two false alarms within a year. 

But fines would kick in with the third: $120 for residences and double that for commercial buildings. For a fourth false call, the fines would rise to $150 and $300; and for a fifth, $180 and $360. An administrative penalty would be tacked on for subsequent false alarms.

UPDATE: Dennis Rogers, senior vice president for public policy and economic development at the Sacramento Metro Chamber, tells me that the item may be pulled from tonight's agenda so that the Chamber can work with the city on the issue.   

UPDATE #2: Council action on the issue was postponed until Aug. 21. City Manager John Shirey says he pulled the item because there may be some incorrect information in the staff report.

The Fire Department says it wastes a lot of its staff time and resources on false calls, with the most common cause being inadequate maintenance of automatic alarm systems. False alarms account for about 15 percent of all emergency calls, about 8,700 incidents a year. A standard response to a downtown commercial building requires units from three or four stations; hundreds of times a year, those units are then unavailable for real emergencies, the department says. It also says that similar programs are in effect in many other California cities, including Roseville and West Sacramento.

Last month, council members unanimously approved similar fines for false burglar alarms.

Now, there are no fines for the first three bogus calls, and the penalty for next five is $50 each.

Starting Oct. 1, the fines will start with the second false burglar alarm, costing $60. The third will cost $80. Second false panic or robbery alarms will cost $120 and the third $220.

Also, after three false calls at the same address, police will not respond until the alarm has been verified as real.

The Police Department says that it has averaged 26,000 false alarms a year for the last three years, 97 percent of all alarms calls. That hurts the ability to respond to legitimate emergencies, especially when budget cuts have reduced the ranks, the department says.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.



About The Swarm

The Swarm is written by members of The Sacramento Bee's editorial board. They meet daily and are separate from the newsroom. Views included here are those of individual writers, and do not necessarily reflect those of a majority of the board or the positions expressed in The Bee's editorials.

October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Stuart Leavenworth on Twitter

Follow "SacBeeEditBoard" on Twitter